Il 01/09/2016 15:25, Mattias Gaertner ha scritto:
[...]
>Using a package isn't a very intuitive solution, when*all* the units
>belong to the project.
Because of circular dependencies or because of company rules?
No, I just mean that while putting into a package a group of units which
perfor
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:58:10 +0200
Giuliano Colla wrote:
>[...]
> Using a package isn't a very intuitive solution, when *all* the units
> belong to the project.
Because of circular dependencies or because of company rules?
> this could make it much easier to have more than one project in the
Il 01/09/2016 13:12, Mattias Gaertner ha scritto:
ppus do not include the defines, so a simple compile won't rebuild ppu
files. That's by design.
How do you share units?
If you do it manually by adding unit paths to the Compiler Options then
you have to clean up manually.
If you use Lazarus pack
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:53:57 +0200
Giuliano Colla wrote:
> I have two Lazarus projects, let's call them project A and project B,
> which share the same sources, only with a different define: let's say
> -dProjA and -dProjB.
>
> If, starting from a clean situation, I compile first project A, and
I have two Lazarus projects, let's call them project A and project B,
which share the same sources, only with a different define: let's say
-dProjA and -dProjB.
If, starting from a clean situation, I compile first project A, and then
project B, most of the modules aren't recompiled, and I end
