Re: [Launchpad-dev] 9 second hard timeout (no new timeout bugs)

2011-04-21 Thread Francis J. Lacoste
On April 20, 2011, Robert Collins wrote: > Of course, we have some really hard pages to fix, and many more that > timeout only a few times a day, but we've fixed enough pages to be > managably down to a 9 second cap. Wow, that's awesome news! We should stop and congratulate ourselves. Next time y

Re: [Launchpad-dev] 9 second hard timeout (no new timeout bugs)

2011-04-21 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Francis J. Lacoste's message of Thu Apr 21 06:44:00 -0700 2011: > On April 20, 2011, Robert Collins wrote: > > Of course, we have some really hard pages to fix, and many more that > > timeout only a few times a day, but we've fixed enough pages to be > > managably down to a 9 second c

Re: [Launchpad-dev] Bug tracker +text interface

2011-04-21 Thread Terence Simpson
On 20 April 2011 23:42, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Terence Simpson wrote: > We really don't care for or against it. The +text interface is read > 200K times a day at the moment across bugs in distributions, so its > about 2% of our total traffic load. We can support

[Launchpad-dev] 5, 9, 23, 51 and other numbers

2011-04-21 Thread Francis J. Lacoste
(Posted on the blog at http://blog.launchpad.net/general/5-9-23-51-and-other- numbers) We are now two months away from our next Thunderdome. How are we doing in regards with the objectives set for that milestone? You may recall from my last post the objectives: * have no timeouts with a cut-