Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-03 Thread Ross Moore
Hi all. On 04/01/2006, at 6:57 AM, jos wrote: Since we're on the topic of the classic tilde problem, I have not yet found a solution that works also for PDF links. For years, I have been using "\~{}" within \htmladdnormallink{}{}, and that has worked fine for If there is a workaround in th

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-03 Thread Ian MacPhedran
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, jos wrote: > Since we're on the topic of the classic tilde problem, I have not yet > found a solution that works also for PDF links. > > If there is a workaround in the LaTeX source, please let me know what it is! Use: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/%7Ejos/ Since % is a comment,

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-03 Thread jos
Thanks! It's not pretty (prints as '%7Ejos'), but it does work. - Julius At 12:57 PM 1/3/2006, Ian MacPhedran wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, jos wrote: > Since we're on the topic of the classic tilde problem, I have not yet > found a solution that works also for PDF links. > > If there is a workaro

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-03 Thread jos
Since we're on the topic of the classic tilde problem, I have not yet found a solution that works also for PDF links. For years, I have been using "\~{}" within \htmladdnormallink{}{}, and that has worked fine for print and HTML, but for PDF links it fails since I started using, according to l

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-03 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Bob van der Poel wrote: > Robin Fairbairns wrote: > > > > Thanks for the pointer, Les. After smacking the side of head a few times > > > the light is slowly coming on :) > > > > > > Yes, a tilde is a non-breaking space. So, with > > > > > > \newcommand{\path}[1]{\texttt{#1}} >

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-03 Thread Bob van der Poel
Robin Fairbairns wrote: Thanks for the pointer, Les. After smacking the side of head a few times the light is slowly coming on :) Yes, a tilde is a non-breaking space. So, with \newcommand{\path}[1]{\texttt{#1}} I can do something like \path{\~{}/foo} and it works just fine. But, if I use

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-02 Thread Igor Peshansky
Top-post reformatted... On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Bob van der Poel wrote: > Les Richardson wrote: > > > > Hi. I am using the url package and have some lines like: > > > > > > \path{~/foo} > > > > > > Without looking at the source for url I am assuming that \path is a > > > special form of verbatim ..

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-02 Thread Robin Fairbairns
> > Thanks for the pointer, Les. After smacking the side of head a few times > the light is slowly coming on :) > > Yes, a tilde is a non-breaking space. So, with > > \newcommand{\path}[1]{\texttt{#1}} > > I can do something like \path{\~{}/foo} and it works just fine. But, if > I use the \pa

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-02 Thread Bob van der Poel
Thanks for the pointer, Les. After smacking the side of head a few times the light is slowly coming on :) Yes, a tilde is a non-breaking space. So, with \newcommand{\path}[1]{\texttt{#1}} I can do something like \path{\~{}/foo} and it works just fine. But, if I use the \path{} from the url.

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

2006-01-02 Thread Les Richardson
Hi, The tilde is a non-breaking space in TeX... can't one just escape it (\~) and have it function normally? Les Richardson Open Admin for Schools > > Hi. I am using the url package and have some lines like: > > \path{~/foo} > > Without looking at the source for url I am assuming that \pat

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

1999-06-14 Thread Anonymous
[about using \~{} in hyperlinks] WL> This works as expected, but is really ugly. Now my question: Does WL> a better solution exist? You might want to try the `hthtml'-packages which is now part of l2h. Probably you need to patch l2h too (which version are you using?) It s

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

1999-06-14 Thread Jens Krinke
> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: WL> This works as expected, but is really ugly. Now my question: Does WL> a better solution exist? You might want to try the `hthtml'-packages which is now part of l2h. Probably you need to patch l2h too (which version are you using?)

Re: [l2h] Tilde problem

1999-06-14 Thread Uli Wortmann
Werner> in trying to write a document which can be processed by Werner> latex, pdflatex, and latex2html, I have a problem with Werner> tilde characters (l2h version 99.1, hyperref version 6.56 Werner> 1999/04/13): Werner> \Href{http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/wp.html}