I am trying to do some simple filtering with htb and the following class
hierarchy:
1:
|
1:10
/ \
1:100 1:200
/ \
1:1000 ...
Internal traffic should go to 1:200 and external traffic to 1:100 with
further distinction based on dst ip made there.
The probl
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 04:59:33PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> Tobias Geiger wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >recently Martin explained, how to avoid these "tc filter" lines in our
> >scripts.
> >unfortunatly it doesn't work with my setup.
> >i add a "dummy" tc filter - line:
> >
> >tc filter a
Hi :)
Tobias Geiger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recently Martin explained, how to avoid these "tc filter" lines in our
> scripts.
> unfortunatly it doesn't work with my setup.
> i add a "dummy" tc filter - line:
>
> tc filter add dev imq1 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw classid 10:10
>
> which
Hi,
recently Martin explained, how to avoid these "tc filter" lines in our
scripts.
unfortunatly it doesn't work with my setup.
i add a "dummy" tc filter - line:
tc filter add dev imq1 parent 10:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw classid 10:10
which of course works, but i have no fwmark "1", but
> >
> > This is a bug in 'tc filter show'.
>
> Is there a patch?
no, only complete rewrite would help ;)
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
- Original Message -
From: "bert hubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jan Coppens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:21AM +0200, Jan Coppens wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
Hello,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Carlo Borelli wrote:
> I've the same problem with a plain 2.4.17 patched to 2.4.18-pre3 with
> FreeS/WAN 1.97 and ext3 patch.
>
> [root@fw linux]# patch -p1 < ../routes-2.4.16-6.diff
> patching file include/net/ip_fib.h
> patching file include/net/route.h
> p
I've the same problem with a plain 2.4.17 patched to 2.4.18-pre3 with
FreeS/WAN 1.97 and ext3 patch.
[root@fw linux]# patch -p1 < ../routes-2.4.16-6.diff
patching file include/net/ip_fib.h
patching file include/net/route.h
patching file include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_nat.h
patching file include/
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why don't he(she) use nth patch from the pom for load ballancing?
> It works fine for me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew Kozachenko
i haven't said it clearly but he has links to 3 DIFFERENT ISP (3 different IP),
so nth packet marking isn't en
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:51:39AM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:32:51AM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> >
> > Hi all !
> >
> > I noticed a small (typo?) error in section "13.1. Reverse Path
> > Filtering", which says:
>
> Arent't there kernels which support '2' as well? I
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:21AM +0200, Jan Coppens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I try to run the ultimate traffic conditioner (cbq implementation), I get this
>strange output:
This is a bug in 'tc filter show'.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.t
Hi all,
When I try to run the ultimate traffic conditioner
(cbq implementation), I get this strange output:
/tc# ./ultimate
/tc# tc filter show dev eth1filter parent 1:
protocol ip pref 10 u32filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 803: ht
divisor 1filter parent 1: protocol ip pref
Hello,
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> If you establish a connection to a server using a public IP from ISP1,
> and then go and establish a connection to the same server using a public
> IP from ISP2, you cannot until after the routing cache has been flushed.
On Monday 29 April 2002 06:08, hanhbnetfilter wrote:
> Dear sir(lady)
> I used iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss011019-donotuse.tar.gz
> and iputils-ss011202.tar.gz for linux kernel 2.4.18
> iptables 1.2.6
>
> CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=y
>
> CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NETLINK=y
> i can use any command option about "ip"
> b
14 matches
Mail list logo
