Hi all,
When I try to run the ultimate traffic conditioner
(cbq implementation), I get this strange output:
/tc# ./ultimate
/tc# tc filter show dev eth1
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 803: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 803::800 order 2048 key ht 803 bkt 0 flowid 1:20 match 00000000/00000000 at 16 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00060000/00ff0000 at 8
match 05000000/0f00ffc0 at 0 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00010000/00ff0000 at 8 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 803: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 803::800 order 2048 key ht 803 bkt 0 flowid 1:20 match 00000000/00000000 at 16 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00060000/00ff0000 at 8 match 05000000/0f00ffc0 at 0 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00010000/00ff0000 at 8 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 11 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 803: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 803::800 order 2048 key ht 803 bkt 0 flowid 1:20 match 00000000/00000000 at 16 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00060000/00ff0000 at 8 match 05000000/0f00ffc0 at 0 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00010000/00ff0000 at 8 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 12 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 803: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 803::800 order 2048 key ht 803 bkt 0 flowid 1:20 match 00000000/00000000 at 16 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00060000/00ff0000 at 8 match 05000000/0f00ffc0 at 0 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 32 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00010000/00ff0000 at 8 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 13 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 1:10 match 00100000/00ff0000 at 0 /tc# As you can see, the script adds way to many u32
filters. I did some testing, and figured out the problem has something to do
with the different priorities. when I give each u32 filter the same priority, I
get the right number of filters.
Is this output correct? If not, what can be the
problem?
thanks,
Jan
---
Jan Coppens Ghent University - IMEC Department of Information Technology
(INTEC)
Broadband Communication Networks (IBCN) Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat, 41
B-9000, Gent Belgium |
- Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner Jan Coppens
- Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner bert hubert
- Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner Jan Coppens
- Re: [LARTC] Ultimate Traffic Conditioner Martin Devera