Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Off line extensions files

2011-01-23 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hi, 2011/1/23 KAMI911 KAMI911 > if it is even better, i can provide po files for these extensions. > Maybe it is better, easier. I wrote two script to export to po and > import back to properties files. > > What is better for us? > for teams not using Pootle the po format is better. For Pootl

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Off line extensions files

2011-01-23 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi, if it is even better, i can provide po files for these extensions. Maybe it is better, easier. I wrote two script to export to po and import back to properties files. What is better for us? Kami 2011/1/23, Rimas Kudelis : > 2011.01.23 09:24, Andras Timar rašė: >> 2011/1/23 Sophie Gautier:

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Off line extensions files

2011-01-23 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2011.01.23 09:24, Andras Timar rašė: 2011/1/23 Sophie Gautier: Hi all, How do I get the extensions files (.properties files) to work on them off line, even with Gedit would be better than on line for me. Translation of new extensions are poorly prepared in Pootle. I see many empty strings, an

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Off line extensions files

2011-01-22 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Andras, On 23/01/2011 10:24, Andras Timar wrote: 2011/1/23 Sophie Gautier: Hi all, How do I get the extensions files (.properties files) to work on them off line, even with Gedit would be better than on line for me. Translation of new extensions are poorly prepared in Pootle. I see many e

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Off line extensions files

2011-01-22 Thread Andras Timar
2011/1/23 Sophie Gautier : > Hi all, > > How do I get the extensions files (.properties files) to work on them off > line, even with Gedit would be better than on line for me. > Translation of new extensions are poorly prepared in Pootle. I see many empty strings, and translated strings instead of