Re: KX-T: VOIP

2006-12-25 Thread Larry
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:48:48 -0500, you wrote (with possible editing): >Packet8 is one of my "leading contenders". If you know, can you keep >existing telephone numbers or must you accept new ones? If anyone cares, the answer is "yes". Packet8 has a webapp that lets you test numbers on their we

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2006-12-24 Thread Larry
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:33:02 -0500, you wrote (with possible editing): >At 08:32 PM 12/23/2006, Larry wrote: >>We use a Panasonic KX-TD1232-5(I think) PBX with 4 lines. We also >>have broadband. We are considering replacing 3 of those Verizon >>supported lines with VOIP using equipment similar t

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2006-12-24 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > >Does either deliver CPC on abandoned calls? ISTM this is one > >area where the non-POTS providers could show up the loser ILEC's. > > CPC ILEC? Let the AA sort it out, because it's an "extry" in VZ land. You can get it, period? H

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2006-12-24 Thread Carl Navarro
At 10:57 AM 12/24/2006, David Lesher wrote: >Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > > > >Has anyone done this and if so, what are your comments? Thanks. > > > > I have Packet8 and my customers have both Vonage and the local cable > > company's broadband. You still get bad

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2006-12-24 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > >Has anyone done this and if so, what are your comments? Thanks. > > I have Packet8 and my customers have both Vonage and the local cable > company's broadband. You still get bad connections on occasion, but > for the most part i

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2006-12-24 Thread Carl Navarro
At 08:32 PM 12/23/2006, Larry wrote: >We use a Panasonic KX-TD1232-5(I think) PBX with 4 lines. We also >have broadband. We are considering replacing 3 of those Verizon >supported lines with VOIP using equipment similar to Pannaway to do >the conversion which will leave the PBX intact. > >Has any

Re: KX-T: VOIP gateway thinks 1232 is off-hook

2005-10-03 Thread David Kindred
Gents, Thank you all very much for the pointers of what I should track down. I may found the culprit in an answering device that was wired in parallel to CO1. I didn't think to look for such things before your hints. Guess I'll find out in the next couple of days if I was right. Thank you all! Wi

Re: KX-T: VOIP gateway thinks 1232 is off-hook

2005-10-03 Thread Donald Ritchie
This is an interesting, and somewhat common problem. To fully understand the call set up and TEAR DOWN, you need to devote a number hours to reading on the 'net. You will need to understand the various VoIP Protocols You need to understand that a "SIP" adapter MAY NOT be the answer ! http://

Re: KX-T: VOIP gateway thinks 1232 is off-hook

2005-10-03 Thread Mike Magnus
In order for the gateway to see the 1232 as off-hook, it has to think the 1232 is drawing current not 'pumping out' current. It is the gateway that needs to recognize the on/off hook status, the 1232 should always (presumably) know if it is on or off hook... Either the 1232 is drawing too much cu

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-10-03 Thread William C Biggs, MD
We too have used Vonage for one "CO" port. We use call routing for long distance calls to choose this port first; subsequent long distance calls go out a SBC port. Most of our SBC calls are nearby long distance; which are billed at about 8.5c per minute, rather than the 3.2c we pay SBC for out of

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-08-20 Thread Robert Kelley
Try the Instreamer and Extreamer from Barix. It is the best audio over IP for the cost. I use it for radio station feeds over IP. See: http://www.barix.com/audio.html. Bob Kelley On 8/20/05, Donald Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a customer that needs a "remote audio feed" . > On

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-08-20 Thread County Wide Comms
Donald Ritchie wrote: >Thanks for all the ideas, never thought about the IP P.A. stuff, but >that stuff is "BIG BUX"! >I know the $150.00 per end Multitech will probably work. but I was >looking for a slightly "more elegant" >( read "cheaper") way of doing this, Maybe a couple of OOS SIP boxes

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-08-20 Thread Donald Ritchie
Thanks for all the ideas, never thought about the IP P.A. stuff, but that stuff is "BIG BUX"! I know the $150.00 per end Multitech will probably work. but I was looking for a slightly "more elegant" ( read "cheaper") way of doing this, Maybe a couple of OOS SIP boxes ( E-BAY @$50 BUX EACH ?) w

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-04-06 Thread Michael Barnes
Unless they've changed things, the Pana VoIP cards are supposed to be MultiTech products. Michael Ross Lindahl told me on 4/5/2005 10:15: > To All > I have to propose a machine that will do voip. I am not tda cert. > yet. I was told some time ago that pana voip card is a cisco product in

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-04-06 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > I recently spent some time learning asterisk (www.asterisk.org) on linux > using digium hardware (www.digium.com). You might look at the Sigtel list: https://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/sigtel It's low volume but has the

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-04-05 Thread satz
I recently spent some time learning asterisk (www.asterisk.org) on linux using digium hardware (www.digium.com). There are stand-alone devices without service requirements from www.sipura.com but I haven't worked with them. I use an older kxtd 1232-1. My goal was to use asterisk to forward calls to

Re: KX-T: VOIP

2005-04-05 Thread Charles Patterson
When someone says they want VOIP, you have to find out what they are really talking about. There are a number of ways to use VOIP. Because it is one of the latest buzz words, a lot of people ask for it but don't know what it is. Technically, every phone system can use VOIP... if you connect a

Re: KX-T: Voip

2005-03-18 Thread Nick Charles
. - Nick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of larry Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 9:47 AM To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: Re: KX-T: Voip A well timed question! we're setting up a test bed in the shop to test voip for both dial tone, and kx

Re: KX-T: Voip

2005-03-18 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't have any for sale, but can give some info/advice on using Sipuras with the KX-TDs. Bob larry wrote: > A well timed question! > > we're setting up a test bed in the shop to test voip for both dial tone, and > kxtd to kxtd station linking. > > anyone have used sip boxes (like a sipra-2

Re: KX-T: Voip

2005-03-18 Thread larry
A well timed question! we're setting up a test bed in the shop to test voip for both dial tone, and kxtd to kxtd station linking. anyone have used sip boxes (like a sipra-2000, need 2 port boxes) for sale, for less than ebay prices? also, anyone know of boxes that'll take a T1 and packet it ac

Re: KX-T: Voip

2005-03-18 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > Has anyone used Lingo or Packet 8 ? > > I have a customer that needs more phone lines then SBC can give them. > SBC said that they will need 60 to 90 days for the added 3 lines. > There are now three lines ALL with DSL, I was planni

Re: KX-T: Voip

2005-03-18 Thread John Berry
Make no promises to the customer, keep all your receipts, and charge for ALL your labor. I have found that VOIP, although sound quality is usually good, it usually has 1 second delays when speaking, calls do get dropped sometimes, and echoes are frequent, not to mention your going to be making cha

RE: KX-T: VOIP bridge ?

2004-06-01 Thread Dave Phelps
You've already got a partial answer. I'll elaborate a bit. Although you may not have a choice, going trunk to station port tends to facilitate one-way calls. What I mean is, when the person with the trunk port picks up that trunk, they hear dial tone from the far end station port. The other end h