Re: KX-T: Panasonic voice mail

2005-10-22 Thread SurfSideSound
In a message dated 10/22/2005 5:57:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 3. Set the No DTMF in the custom service routing for x169, menu repeat to > 1, > wait for second digit 1, any other digit may be routed to 169 if you > wish. Wouldn't you want to set NO DTMF go

Re: KX-T: Panasonic voice mail

2005-10-22 Thread David Pelton
nc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512-447-8886 - Original Message - From: "Charles Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 4:57 PM Subject: Re: KX-T: Panasonic voice mail >> 3. Set the No DTMF

Re: KX-T: Panasonic voice mail

2005-10-22 Thread Charles Patterson
he cs menu, right? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:47 AM Subject: Re: KX-T: Panasonic voice mail > Here's what you do. > > 1. Take one port of the voice mail and assign a seperate custom serv

Re: KX-T: Panasonic voice mail

2005-10-22 Thread SurfSideSound
Here's what you do. 1. Take one port of the voice mail and assign a seperate custom service menu to it, say number 10 for example. Make sure the port is in a different ext. group than the other ports so it won't get answered by the ksu. If the system is a TD1232, take the last port on t

KX-T: Panasonic voice mail

2005-10-21 Thread Brad Allen
I have a customer with a kxtd220 voicemail here in the USA. My problem is this. The customer has a number of people answering the phone. The extensions are in a UCD ring group. The customer does not want the calls to go to any VM incuding the general mailbox 998. They want the call to be placed on