Il 29/08/2014 11:12, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
> I don’t know. I am looking at Intel SDM table A-6 (Opcode Extensions
> for One- and Two-byte Opcodes by Group Number). According to the
> table, only group 7 needs RMExt, and in this case the “case
> GroupDual” makes the required checks, in the iteratio
On Aug 29, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/08/2014 10:52, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>>> Patch looks good, but where is the check that MOD == 3 in the "case
>>> RMExt"? Am I just not seeing it?
>>
>> This seems to be part of the “case GroupDual”.
>
> GroupDual handles it, but the
Il 29/08/2014 10:52, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
> > Patch looks good, but where is the check that MOD == 3 in the "case
> > RMExt"? Am I just not seeing it?
>
> This seems to be part of the “case GroupDual”.
GroupDual handles it, but the EXT() macro you're using is exactly what
you want:
#define R
On Aug 29, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/08/2014 10:26, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>> Unlike VMCALL, the instructions VMXOFF, VMLAUNCH and VMRESUME should cause a
>> UD
>> exception in real-mode or vm86. However, the emulator considers all these
>> instructions the same for the m
Il 29/08/2014 10:26, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
> Unlike VMCALL, the instructions VMXOFF, VMLAUNCH and VMRESUME should cause a
> UD
> exception in real-mode or vm86. However, the emulator considers all these
> instructions the same for the matter of mode checks, and emulation upon exit
> due to #UD e
