Il 29/08/2014 11:12, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
> I don’t know. I am looking at Intel SDM table A-6 (Opcode Extensions
> for One- and Two-byte Opcodes by Group Number). According to the
> table, only group 7 needs RMExt, and in this case the “case
> GroupDual” makes the required checks, in the iteration prior to the
> “case RMExt”. Therefore this code path, RMExt without GroupDual
> before it, should never occur. Nonetheless, if you want to avoid
> future bugs, perhaps it is good.

Oh, now I understand what you mean.  Thanks,

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to