"Will the authorities not allow you to test you aircraft to determine if it
meets the requirements. It seems absurd that they disqualify your KR based on
information from a totally different airplane and even yours with a
non-calibrated and questionable ASI system not even knowing the temp and
I've definitely got things against my embezzler ex wife.
Jg
> Nothing against ex wives but hey.
>
> Larry Flesner
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>
>
--
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/ma
On 4/23/2023 2:35 AM, kiwi faulkner via KRnet wrote:
/*"This won't help you, as my KR1 buffets at 62 mph.(53 kts). Haven't
taken it into full stall yet. That was with retracts down. Plane is
pretty much to plans, tho heavy (785 lbs) as flown. "*/
Hi Kevin
On the contrary - the data that you
"This won't help you, as my KR1 buffets at 62 mph.(53 kts). Haven't taken it
into full stall yet. That was with retracts down. Plane is pretty much to
plans, tho heavy (785 lbs) as flown. "
Hi Kevin
On the contrary - the data that you present is extremely useful indeed - thank
you!
It is u
This won't help you, as my KR1 buffets at 62 mph.(53 kts). Haven't taken
it into full stall yet. That was with retracts down. Plane is pretty much
to plans, tho heavy (785 lbs) as flown. It now has fixed gear, but it's
not back in the air yet. Someday...
Kevin Stolhammer
kstolham...@gmail.com
Greetings KR Enthusiasts
I am in the process of restoring New Zealand's only KR-1 which was completed -
as per the plans - in the late seventies and has sat in storage for some
20-plus years since last flying. Of note is the fact that this aeroplane had
no static system, and the static inlets
6 matches
Mail list logo
