Everybody is entitled an opinioin so here is mine. If i were to
consider using a 2 stroke on an aircraft i would look to the marine
engine because those are designed from the very start to operate at
high power settings for long durations. As far as the oil mixing goes
I think anyon
e who just cannot
afford to use an aircraft engine like continental, or Lycoming an out board
motor would be the best alternative.
Bob Stone, Harker Heights, TX
rsto...@hot.rr.com
- Original Message -
From: "ace nunye"
To:
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: K
EAA Chapter 242 at http://EAA242.org
---Original Message---
From: KR builders and pilots
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:24:07 AM
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: KR>RE: 2 strokes
Everybody is entitled an opinioin so here is mine. If i were to
consi
In a message dated 7/4/03 8:00:46 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
rsto...@hot.rr.com writes:
<< I have never agreed that any engine designed for surface vehicles is all
that safe in an aircraft but for those who just cannot afford to use an
aircraft engine like continental, or Lycoming an out board
ne in the
United States.
Bob Stone, Harker Heights, TX
rsto...@hot.rr.com
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: KR>RE: 2 strokes
> In a message dated 7/4/03 8:00:46 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
> rsto...@hot.rr.com writes:
>
> &l
In a message dated 7/5/03 6:01:14 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
rsto...@hot.rr.com writes:
<< I don't understand how your response relates to my comment about aircraft
engines being safer than auto engines in aircraft since all Rotax designs that
I am aware of are designed specifically for aircraf
ngine in the
>United States.
>
>Bob Stone, Harker Heights, TX
>rsto...@hot.rr.com
>
>- Original Message -
>From:
>To:
>Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:14 AM
>Subject: Re: KR>RE: 2 strokes
>
>
>>In a message dated 7/4/03 8:00:46 AM Mountain Daylight Ti
7 matches
Mail list logo
