As a non-KR-owner, I can only contribute to this thread from a
lawyer/pilot's general perspective:
1.Any airport, even public, has the right to set the conditions for
planes based there, as long as the conditions are applied equally, including
requiring reasonable liability insurance.
2.Th
ginal Message -
From: "Max Hardberger"
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:39:46 -0500
To: , "KR builders and pilots"
Subject: KR>Insurance & Liability
> As a non-KR-owner, I can only contribute to this thread from a
> lawyer/pilot's
>Max,
> Thanks so much for your discussion on transfering ownership to a
>corporation. I had a bit of exposure to
>the incorporation process having incorporated as an EAA
>chapter in the state of Oregon. It was a non-profit, but
>many of the forms were the same. Other than bylaws, and
>annua
;Max Hardberger"
>Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:39:46 -0500
>To: , "KR builders and pilots"
>Subject: KR>Insurance & Liability
>
>> As a non-KR-owner, I can only contribute to this thread from a
>> lawyer/pilot's general perspective:
>>
>
ason
Sent: 08/13/03 07:37 AM
To: KR builders and pilots
Subject: Re: KR>Insurance & Liability
>
> I've registered my 150 as a asset in my corporation and will do the same
with my KR2 [ sell it to the corporation]. Both will have a purpose relative
to our business as stated in th
>From: Brian Kraut
>I think you do need to be carefull in transfering a plane to a corporation
>if you do not have a comercial ticket. Make sure you are not stepping over
>the bounds between flying "incidental" to a business, as the FAA puts it,
>and flying for a business. I am not an expert
I don't believe the KR can be certified for commercial rating/use, or can
any experimental plane.
Perhaps Business use is a proper terminology...
But then I don't know much!!!
John S.Monday
Laguna Beach, CA
7 matches
Mail list logo
