OK, you didn't ask for it...well some did offline with my
cheapest/easiest statement yesterday.
Here is the the state of the project
http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg
Here is what I got via truck line yesterday
http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero2.jpg
It is a rotary 13B which will produc
Pardon my question, but what additional load carrying capabity and what
additional cruise speed and climb rate
can u expect from this " and I must say impressive"
180 HP Engine.
- Original Message -
From: "Dana Overall"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:16 AM
Su
>From: "joe"
>Pardon my question, but what additional load carrying capabity and what
>additional cruise speed and climb rate
>can u expect from this " and I must say impressive"
>180 HP Engine.
I'm not gaining any load/climb nor cruise although the top end may increase
a couple miles an hour t
>
> >
> OH, KR related.you can get a rotary to fit:-)
That's fine, but wouldn't it be a little nose heavy? According to
rotaryaviation's FAQ page the firewall forward weight of the engine is 345 lbs.
Any comment?
Wolfgang
You build a single rotor, rather than dual rotor and give it a turbo you
should still be able to get 120 out of it.
>That's fine, but wouldn't it be a little nose heavy? According to
>rotaryaviation's FAQ page the firewall forward weight of the engine is 345
>lbs. Any comment?
>Wolfgang
Magic"
Finish kit
Buying Instruments. Hangar flying my Dynon.
http://rvflying.tripod.com
do not archive
>From:
>Reply-To: KRnet
>To: KRnet
>Subject: Re: KR>Fun Friday-lost my mind:-)
>Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 9:28:41 -0500
>
>
> >
> > >
> > OH, KR relat
You read a different post than I did. The figure was 245# dry. However, It
did not spell out exactly what dry meant.
> OH, KR related.you can get a rotary to fit:-)
>That's fine, but wouldn't it be a little nose heavy? According to
>rotaryaviation's FAQ page the firewall forward we
> If something happens to this inflight..run it even if it
> trashes the engine, I can buy a new totally rebuilt short block, built
> for aero use, for $3500 or just find another one and rebuild it using all
> the other accessories. I don't forsee that happening but my gains appear
Hi Dana.
Good move deciding on using a wankel. Your description of them being
'bullet proof' is absolute! And 180 hp topsnaturally asperated in somethng
the size of a large breadbox IS impressive!
I got into the rotary about 6 years ago, bought and rebuilt one, and am
amazed that there are not
4:16 AM
Subject: KR>Fun Friday-lost my mind:-)
> OK, you didn't ask for it...well some did offline with my
> cheapest/easiest statement yesterday.
>
> Here is the the state of the project
> http://rvflying.tripod.com/aero1.jpg
>
> Here is what I got via truck
Rotory's, Try the ACRE Newsletter list.
rotaryeng...@earthlink.net Virg
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:16:34 -0500 "Dana Overall"
writes:
> OK, you didn't ask for it...well some did offline with my
> cheapest/easiest statement yesterday.
>
> Here is the the state of the project
> http:/
Single rotor available, Virg
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 9:28:41 -0500 writes:
>
> >
> > >
> > OH, KR related.you can get a rotary to fit:-)
>
> That's fine, but wouldn't it be a little nose heavy? According to
> rotaryaviation's FAQ page the firewall forward weight of the engine
Peter,
The reason why rotary engines are out of business almost worldwide is
because they pollute much more than conventional engines, and therefore,
they could no longer meet the very stringent pollution regulations of the
1990's.
Mazda was the only manufacturer giving it a try, and they decided
>
>The reason why rotary engines are out of business almost worldwide is
>because they pollute much more than conventional engines, and therefore,
>they could no longer meet the very stringent pollution regulations of the
>1990's.
>Mazda was the only manufacturer giving it a try, and they decided t
14 matches
Mail list logo
