So Dana.. that seems to take care of the instruments and avionics > what else
as far as the physical airplane engine and controls???
I know about the heated Pitot but anything else we should be aware of???
Thanks,
John S. Monday
KR2S
Laguna Beach, CA
Art, while technically correct, the use o
rom: jsmon...@aol.com
>Reply-To: KRnet
>To: kr...@mylist.net
>Subject: Re: KR>DAR's and inspections
>Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:13:48 EST
>
>So Dana.. that seems to take care of the instruments and avionics > what
>else
>as far as the physical airplane engine and
>Once again, with that said, my own personnal opinion is the KR is not an
>acceptable IFR platform. Others may feel differently on the issue.
>
>
>
>Dana Overall
An IFR KR2 could be called a military plane. The design gives outstanding
performance, but enough things are hung on to make it a ma
> "Dana Overall" writes:
> I would also encourgage anyone interested to go to the
> following website:
http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/tvrvbg/_borders/IFR%20equipment.pdf
That has the answer, thank you !
"...none of the equipment... is required to be [ TSO'd ]..."
We =can= use the less ex
>From: intrepid...@juno.com
We =can= use the less expensive non-TSO'd ground based
> (ADF/VOR/LOC/GS) avionics with impunity.
>
Better put the brakes on a little.
As the it reads, the non TSO'd equipment does not have to be constructed
according to TSO requirements but it is still the responsi
>> intrepid...@juno.com concluded:
>> We =can= use the less expensive non-TSO'd ground
>> based (ADF/VOR/LOC/GS) avionics with impunity.
> "Dana Overall" previously wrote:
> Now the nuts and bolts.(FAA Advisory Circular 20-138)
>
> "Dana Overall" now writes:
> Better put the brakes on a little.
>
> We can agree to disagree, too. Not a problem.
> I'm back to sanding in the 34-F carport. Winds of 20,
> gusts to 35 blowing the dust away.
> Painting will have to wait until it gets a =lot= warmer
> and a bit less windy!
>
> a r t
Whatever, just don't get violoated. I don
Dan, let's see if we can put an end to this:-). No, I am not the FAA nor
did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. OK, that stuff out of the
way. This issue is brought up about once a year on any aviation list.
Through the course of years I have seen FAA guys and DAR guys jump in on t
> "Dana Overall" writes:
> The IFR equipment install must be TSO'd equipment to
> legally use the system but supporting equipment such as
> airspeed, altimeter, and so on, do not have to be TSO'd.
This is a common impression, that avionics must be TSO'd.
But which FAR, by number please, requi
RE:
Art Cacella 1970 American AA-1 N6155L "Dinkie", flying 33 yrs.
1972 KR-1 plans, still not started on
2004 Sonerai-I, on gear w/engine, making wings
2004 Moni-m/G, on gear, mounting engine & wings
2004 Polly, mini-RV-6, mounting engine & gear
200? Intrepid, all metal canard pusher, 4-pl, parts
Art, while technically correct, the use of non TSO's equipment for IFR use
is very restricted. Now, I am not referring to airspeed, altimeter and so
on. This equipment is definitely non TSO'd proper.
Ref. FAR 91.205
Required. Ref. FAR 61.57 (c)
Required. Ref. FAR 61.3 (e)
The first three sh
11 matches
Mail list logo
