Try them in X-Plane, It's fun to experiment with.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Langford
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Thursday, February 2, 2006 8:29 pm
Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
> Russ Bell wrote:
>
> > What is current thought o
: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Friday, February 3, 2006 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
>
> I have read much on the new airfoil from the posts... but I am
> still left
> wondering
>
> what are the net effects of the new airfoil over the raf48?
>
>
What is current thought on AOI for the AS504x
airfoils? Looks like initial calculations were 1
degree. Has that been found to be optimal?
Russ Bell
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.
Russ Bell wrote:
> What is current thought on AOI for the AS504x
> airfoils? Looks like initial calculations were 1
> degree. Has that been found to be optimal?
All that have been built to data have been 1 degree and nobody's complained
yet. My fuselage is right at zero degrees at low altitude w
7;s thoughts welcome. Thanks.
Tony
> ---Original Message---
> From: Mark Langford
> Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
> Sent: 03 Feb '06 01:29
>
> Russ Bell wrote:
>
> > What is current thought on AOI for the AS504x
> > airfoils
ot;KRnet"
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
Mark et al.:
I'd like to follow up on your last comment with a question/clarification.
I've read your thoughts on AOI etc. I believe the project (boat with main
spars in place) I just pu
Tony wrote:
> I've read your thoughts on AOI etc. I believe the project (boat with main
> spars in place) I just purchased was built to original KR2 plans, so I
> assume it is using 3.5degre AOI for wings?. I intend on going with the
> AS504x. I've been thinking I will have to find a way to ra
--Original Message---
> From: Mark Langford
> Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
> Sent: 03 Feb '06 06:43
>
> Tony wrote:
>
> > I've read your thoughts on AOI etc. I believe the project (boat with main
> > spars in place) I just purchased
e* h--- r- y+++*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
>From: "Bob Glidden"
>Reply-To: KRnet
>To: "michaela" ,"KRnet"
>Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
>Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:45:35 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from
link.net
-Original Message
; micha...@tonypickering.com
Subject: Re: KR> angle of incidence, AS504x
I have read much on the new airfoil from the posts... but I am still
left
wondering
what are the net effects of the new airfoil over the raf48?
I have 2 sets of wings. DD and an
Hi gang, here I go again,
I am going to risk the possibility of another personal attack on my
building know-how by asking for help in a problem I have with the KR plans.
In checking the plans, Drawing #2 for the KR2, [this sheet is included ,
as you know ] in plans for the KR2S I che
I am not an expert on airfoils, but I suspect the problem is because the zero
lift line on the airfoil is most likely not parallel with the bottom of the two
spars. I don't know exactly where it is on the airfoils in question, but
someone else on the list should know.
I did look in one of the
d you
some photos .
Regards
Chris Gardiner
KR2S C-GKRZ
- Original Message -
From: "robert tallini"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 3:48 PM
Subject: KR>Angle of incidence
> Hi gang, here I go again,
> I am going to risk the possibility of another personal a
Bob,
Seems to me that 48" is the radius of your circle, not the diameter. Don't
you need to multiply it by 2?
Ken Jones
- Original Message -
From: "robert tallini"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 3:48 PM
Subject: KR>Angle of incidence
> Hi gang, her
I studied the plans for some time before installing my wing
centersection spars. I heard all the old stories about the banana
boat syndrome of the upper longerons and all that. There is a
very simple and accurate way to do the job that involves no math
at all and can be done with a simple bubb
15 matches
Mail list logo
