Don't know how many there are but I am privileged to have flown both types
successfully anyway.The Tri-gear is a much easier ground handler with over
the nose visiblity and directional stability.However,the taildragger is
still the best handling dragger in aviation.Tommy W.
Tommy Waymack wrote:
> However,the taildragger is
> still the best handling dragger in aviation.Tommy W.
That is exactly what Troy Petteway told me before I started flying mine, and
he's owned and flown them all, and has a gazillion hours of taildragger time
(not to mention Citation Bizjet and
I agree, I was absolutely shocked the first time I taxiid mine, after
reading about all the "how hard it is" stories. It was like driving a go
cart only easier.
RE: How will Jones ever find out what he is missing?
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
See you in Mt. Verno
KR-2S CorvAIRCRAFT web site at www.flykr2s.com
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Heath"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: KR> Tri-gear comparison
> I agree, I was absolutely shocked the first time I taxiid mine, after
> reading about all the "
>I could convert..but then there is a time for building and a time for
>flyingI built for seven years and now I am loving flying! It sure would
>be hard to tear into those stub wings and revert to building again.
>Mark Jones
+++
Don't let t
> >I could convert..but then there is a time for building and a
> time for
> >flyingI built for seven years and now I am loving flying! It
> sure would
> >be hard to tear into those stub wings and revert to building
> again.
> >Mark Jones
> ++
Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On
Behalf Of Mark Jones
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:06 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> Tri-gear comparison
I could convert..but then there is a time for building and a time for
flyingI built for seven years and no
7 matches
Mail list logo
