I'm curious about the KR-Super2
Plans on line downloadable for free
Seems a better aircraft
As I believe you get what you pay for I'm obviously missing something
On 24/03/2014 5:56 PM, Neville Sutton wrote:
> Whats he difference between KR2s and the KRSuper2
Thanks all for replying
But my Question is more to the point WHY
While looking to plans build the KRs2 in Australia with the problem it
may not be able to be registered under Australian Recrational lic
Hi Neville,
It is possible to get a KR2(S) onto the RA-Aus register in Oz - there are a
few there already. Keep in mind that the requirement is for stall of 45kts
at MTOW in the landing configuration (and presumably at sea level on a
standard day - 15C 1013 hPa). There are mods (e.g. bigger flap
On 2014-03-30 9:42 PM, Neville Sutton wrote:
> On 24/03/2014 5:56 PM, Neville Sutton wrote:
>> Whats he difference between KR2s and the KRSuper2
The differances are listed on page one of the site
http://www.krsuper2.com/
, March 24, 2014 10:37 AM
To: krnet at list.krnet.org
Subject: Re: KR> KR-Super2
According to the literature there is no real weight savings (well, at least
if using glass--would likely have significant weight savings from your hip
pocket area with CF), but the structure is slighty larger an
Whats he difference between KR2s and the KRSuper2
"The KR-Super2 is a Corvair powered, all composite, two seat
experimental aircraft modeled after the Rand Robinson KR2S."
http://krsuper2.com/
Looks like new engineering of a proven design...
Wayne (oldmoparguy)
> KR> KR-Super2
> Marty Martin martygmartin at gmail.com
&g
KR Super is all composition. Little to no wood used.
On Mar 24, 2014 2:57 AM, "Neville Sutton" wrote:
> Whats he difference between KR2s and the KRSuper2
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe f
According to the literature there is no real weight savings (well, at
least if using glass--would likely have significant weight savings from
your hip pocket area with CF), but the structure is slighty larger and
offers more stiffness. It is a pretty design, and very interesting, but
I'm a little
If the super is all composition and very little wood. Which is lighter.
And is it Fiber Glass or Carbon Fiber?
Greg
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Adam Tippin wrote:
> KR Super is all composition. Little to no wood used.
> On Mar 24, 2014 2:57 AM, "Neville Sutton" wrote:
>
> > Whats he di
Original Message
Subject:Re: KR> KR-2 or KR super2
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:37:25 -0600
From: Glenn Martin
To: KRnet
On 12/13/2011 2:47 PM, Debbie Benson wrote:
> I'm getting ready to build a KR-2 ,but undecid
At 02:47 PM 12/13/2011, you wrote:
>I'm getting ready to build a KR-2 ,but undecided on which way to build.
>The standard way with spruce longerons and braces or the all
>composite construction.
>Thanks Bob
++
Unless you feel
On 12/13/2011 2:47 PM, Debbie Benson wrote:
> I'm getting ready to build a KR-2 ,but undecided on which way to build.
>
So far, there is not a completed Kr2 super 2, but there are plenty of
KR2 (S) flying around, and a large community to draw upon.
--
Glenn Martin,
KR2 N1333A,
Biloxi, MS
I'm getting ready to build a KR-2 ,but undecided on which way to build. The
standard way with spruce longerons and braces or the all composite
construction. I have not seen anyone with an all composite airplane post any
info on flight times or such. I will appreciate comments on the pros & co
14 matches
Mail list logo
