KR> Stick forces

2010-01-19 Thread BadBob
My Cassutt is probably close to a KR. I have a friend with a Lancair 235 sporting an 0-290. He and I are both over 200lbs resulting in a rearward cg.. When I first flew the aircraft it took a concerted effort to to not cause pilot induced oscillations. To fly it required "caging" the stick unt

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Ronald Wright
Yes, a Monnett Moni motorglider. Fly with your fingertip. Ron --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Dan Heath wrote: > From: Dan Heath > Subject: RE: KR> Stick forces > To: "'KRnet'" > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 2:06 AM > I am just curious.  Has anyone >

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Dan Heath
I am just curious. Has anyone ever flown a plane that has lighter stick forces than a KR, fly by wire does not count??? See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics  See you at the 2010 - KR Gathering in Richmond, Ky - I39 There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the t

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Fred Johnson
No, some of us(me) are just a little denser than others:-) Fred Johnson Reno, NV Mark L wrote: I guess I'm not very good at explaining things, but that's exactly what I was trying to say. Except I used "3 or 4 inches" and you used 3.5".

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Mark Langford
Fred Johnson wrote: > If your stick is 12" but your attachment point is say 3.5" (from center of > torque tube) wouldn't the forces be 12 divided 3.5 =3.4 times what you > feel > at the end of the stick? I guess I'm not very good at explaining things, but that's exactly what I was trying to say

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Glenn Martin
Mark Langford wrote: > > I designed the ailerons to have the same surface area at the same effective > moment arm about the fuselage roll axis > > Mark, I'm not exactly certain I understand this measurement. Could you give me a brief explanation? Thanks. -- Glenn Martin Owner KR2 N1333A Bil

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Robert Belgau
Hi, I found the following article on the web. http://www.sportplanedesign.com/pdf/LSA_Specs_26-31_SportPilot_v2.pdf It states that for Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) the maximum allowable short-term stick force is 45 lbs and the prolonged is 5.2 lbs. For FAR Part 23 certified aircraft its 60 lbs and

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Fred Johnson
What about the leverage factor of the stick itself? If your stick in 12" but your attachment point is say 3.5" (from center of torque tube) wouldn't the forces be 12 divided 3.5 =3.4 times what you feel at the end of the stick? Fred Johnson Reno, NV Mark L wrote? Don't forget the ratio of t

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Mark Langford
Fred Johnson wrote: > My thought was a cable with the capacity of 80# would be enough, as I > think > that would be two fisted flying:-) Don't forget the ratio of the stick pivot point to the bellcrank attachment points is also a factor. It's probably 3:1 or 4:1 depending on how long the stic

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 01:05 PM 1/18/2010, you wrote: >I ask because I am considering a change in aileron controls. I was >considering a push/pull cable. +++ Just make sure the system you intend to use can be adjusted for "zero" slop in the syst

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Fred Johnson
Thanks Mark! I ask because I am considering a change in aileron controls. I was considering a push/pull cable. I can find them rated from 40# to 200# depending on lengths and total movement required. The cable would be connected to the control stick and connect directly to the ailerons via rod bea

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Mark Langford
Fred Johnson wrote: >I looked at the archives and not much more was said about the stick force > meter? Sid Wood brought one to the Gathering, and I flew with it in my plane. I don't remember the exact number (maybe Sid does), but I believe is was a pound or less is all you need to make the pl

KR> Stick forces

2010-01-18 Thread Fred Johnson
I looked at the archives and not much more was said about the stick force meter? Does anyone have an idea of what the actual stick forces are on the KR? Fred Johnson Reno, NV

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread jump...@aol.com
...what can be done > to raise the stick forces, mainly the elevator, to make it less prone to > PIO. Has any one made the elevator smaller? I know the hoz stab has been made larger (giving same effect? as making elevator smaller), but in looking at aircraft tails most seem to have 2/3 non

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
The KR has been around for almost 35 years and that subject has been discussed many times for almost as many years. Once you fly it for a while, it will not be a problem just like it is, in fact, you might just like it. See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics See you in Mt. V

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread pe...@pwe.co.nz
Interesting! Can these be used in lieu of mass balance? Regards, Peter Wastney - Original Message - From: "Ronald R.Eason" To: "'KRnet'" Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:34 AM Subject: RE: KR> Stick Forces > Some people think it's a matter of ge

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Wladimir Kummer de Paula
Hi all, Although this topic is not specifically KR related I think it would incite some discussion. Once you have your plane ready what can be done to raise the stick forces, mainly the elevator, to make it less prone to PIO. Also, something like a exponential command would also work.

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread D F Lively
Wladimir: Perhaps some creative ways to place springs in the system to create a false load on the stick? This would of course add weight and complexity and there would also be a permanent load on the structure where ever the spring was anchored. Good or bad I am not sure but i would think it cou

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Joseph H. Horton
I think that I will take this in a different direction. I would not change the sensitivity on my KR for love or money. I became comfortable with the elevator with inn the first couple landings. And in fact Mark Langford and I had recently talked about how stiff the ailerons were at speed with the n

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Mark Jones
Make the stick longer thus requiring more movement of the hand/arm, if you hold it at the top, to move the elevator and ailerons. Once you get the feel of the plane, lower your hand on the stick and fly with your finger tips. On smooth days, I generally only have my thumb and forefinger on my stick

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Wood, Sidney M (Titan) @ TITAN
...what can be done to raise the stick forces, mainly the elevator, to make it less prone to PIO. Also, something like a exponential command would also work. 1. You could balance the elevator. The extra mass may slow down jerking around for PIO. Helps with flutter control also. 2. M

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Ron Freiberger
Not if it's an ANTI servo. This is what I had planned for my project, wherever it is now . I agree with item 6 also. Ron Freiberger mail to ronandmartha at earthlink.net -Original Message- From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Wood, Sidney M (T

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Ronald R.Eason
) @ TITAN Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:14 PM To: kr...@mylist.net Subject: KR> Stick Forces ...what can be done to raise the stick forces, mainly the elevator, to make it less prone to PIO. Also, something like a exponential command would also work. 1. You could balance the elevator

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
I believe that if you go with #5 and #6, that you will have no problem with PIO. See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building is OVER. Daniel R. Heath - Lexingto

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
> >Although this topic is not specifically KR related I think it would >incite some discussion. Once you have your plane ready what can be done >to raise the stick forces, mainly the elevator, to make it less prone to >PIO. Also, something like a exponential command would also work. ++

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread James Ferris
I started building a KR-1 in 1974 and built the fuselage and tail and wing spars and had it on the gear and my piloet budies said i would get it into a PIO and kill myself so I stoped. One of our sailplane piolets got a 126 in a PIO on final and did hit his head on the aide rail and did die, maybe

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread James Ferris
If you think this will be a problem? go to www.KRnet.org and look at the KR's that are flying especially Troy Petteway's photo of the horizontal tail and read what he done to solve that very problem when he rebuilt is plane. also look at Bill Rents' KR-1 website. Jim On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:40:43 -

KR> Stick Forces

2008-10-12 Thread ifly...@aol.com
I agree with most KR guys - it flies great just as is - you get used to it real fast - makes a 150 feel like a dumptruck though Bill and 41768

KR> stick forces

2008-10-12 Thread robert clark
Make the stick longer than the plans. It will slow everything down. Bob Clark Ankeny Iowa - Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

KR> stick forces.

2008-10-12 Thread Steve and Lori McGee
For you lucky ones that are flying already. So how much resistance in our chosen little birds stick is there? What kind of pressure from the elevator? I have read there is next to nothing in the ailerons. How about the tail? What kind of back pressure do you feel thru the pedals? Steve McG

KR> stick forces.

2008-10-12 Thread larry flesner
>For you lucky ones that are flying already. So how much resistance in our chosen little birds stick is there? What kind of pressure from the elevator? I have read there is next to nothing in the ailerons. How about the tail? What kind of back pressure do you feel thru the pedals? >>Steve McGe