Mark I'm also doing away with the header tank since the idea of a fuel =
tank
in my lap doesn't greatly appeal to me. What I have decided however is =
to
use that area previously occupied by the tank as a luggage compartment =
to
keep weight as far forward as possible. By making this compartment as
I really liked the dual sticks for a few reasons. One is that it lets you
rest your hand on your leg. EITHER hand when one gets tired. I also liked
the fact that I could trim the elevator and fold sectionals with both hands
while I kept the plane going straight with my knees.
The one disadvanta
One thing I can tell you is that my seat back is right in the middle of the
"4-6" range in the plans (I think that's right), and it could be leaned back
a little more for my taste. I wouldn't mind if my stick was aft about 3"
more than it is. See http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/kcontrol.html
Mark L says:
I wouldn't mind if my stick was aft about 3" more than it is. See
http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/kcontrol.html ).
Thank you Mark L
Colin R says:
My seats are 4 inches further forward then plans, bottom 4 inches
forward of rear spar, and seat back
but Mark has zero belly
Steve J wrote:
> My primary motive is to minimize the aft CG shift (when the second
> trusting soul comes aboard) by relocating the seats closer to the CG.
> Ideally the variable payload should be on the CG, but that is the price
> of side-by-side seating.
You might be going to more trouble than
6 matches
Mail list logo
