KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread Brad Payne
Did I read that right Mark? Rolls? :) Did you do anything special to beef up the structure or is it fine as it is for simple aerobatics? I see the KR-2 plans say + or - 7G, but what about the KR2S? Brad Payne www.n494bp.com bradleyspa...@gmail.com

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
> >Did you do anything special to beef up the structure or is it fine as it is >for simple aerobatics? I see the KR-2 plans say + or - 7G, but what about >the KR2S? >Brad Payne That's +/- 7 G's at 800 pounds !! You need to re-calculate

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread Randy Smith
For my own knowledge were does the # 5600 come from. I have never figured g load and with my loaded weight it really brings me down on the g load to 4.6 I know on some planes + and - are different. is there a different # to figure - g ? --- Larry&Sallie Flesner wrote: > > > > >Did you do anythi

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread Larry&Sallie Flesner
At 07:50 AM 3/12/2007, you wrote: >For my own knowledge were does the # 5600 come from. +++ + / - 7G's at 800 pounds. 7 X 800 = 5600 pounds = design maximum weight the structure will carry. If your KR weighs 1000 pounds, the structure will still only

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread J L
If you do it right, you should not impose more than 1g on the airframe in a roll. Jeff On 3/12/07, Larry&Sallie Flesner wrote: > At 07:50 AM 3/12/2007, you wrote: > >For my own knowledge were does the # 5600 come from. > +++ > > + / - 7G's at 800 pound

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread Brian Kraut
rian Kraut Engineering Alternatives, Inc. www.engalt.com -Original Message- From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On Behalf Of J L Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:32 AM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> Rolling the KR If you do it right, you should not impose more than 1g on

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread AVLEC
r See: www.whisperaircraft.com mailto: av...@telkomsa.net - Original Message - From: "J L" To: "KRnet" Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 5:32 PM Subject: Re: KR> Rolling the KR > If you do it right, you should not impose more than 1g on the airframe > in a roll. > > Jeff

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread Randy Smith
That would be 2Gs We are at 1G just sitting here. I have loop, rolled, spun and even got my KR in a tale skid (pulled to hard while to far back in CG). It will straighten out with very little effort. Get some altitude and have fun. Thanks Larry --- J L wrote: > If you do it right, you should n

KR> Rolling the KR

2008-10-12 Thread J L
Actually, I meant 1g, or as in you should pull nothing over 1g in an axial roll. In other words, you would not "pull" anything, just maintain 1g all the way around. Sorry for the lack of clarity. Jeff On 3/12/07, Randy Smith wrote: > That would be 2Gs We are at 1G just sitting here. I > have l