rian.kraut=engalt@mylist.net]On Behalf Of
Mark Langford
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:46 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> Right of way
Colin Rainey wrote:
> Since the "vehicle" was of the non-airport employee type and merely
> cutting
> the grass etc... he would qualif
Mark said:
Who's got the right of way in such a situation?
Since the "vehicle" was of the non-airport employee type and merely cutting
the grass etc... he would qualify under the "people, vehicles or structures"
part of the regs where a pilot in command is not allowed to fly lower than
500 feet ab
Colin Rainey wrote:
> Since the "vehicle" was of the non-airport employee type and merely
> cutting
> the grass etc... he would qualify under the "people, vehicles or
> structures"
> part of the regs where a pilot in command is not allowed to fly lower than
> 500 feet above.
If that 500' stuff
3 matches
Mail list logo
