I like the idea of a reduction drive unit, to swing a larger, hence more
efficient prop. My concern is the ground clearnce, which at the monet looks
like some 6". What should be a minimum here?
PETER WASTNEY ENGINEERING LTD
222 Wakapuaka Road
RD1
Nelson
Tel: 03 545 0848
Fax: 03 545 0848
Web: www.
I like the idea of a reduction drive unit, to swing a larger.
-
Sorry, not sure of your Name, but
Seeing I have not seen a reply, I will jump in here.
Are up using Tri gear or tail dragger
I have Diehl gear, and the new nose leg is long and my need shorting if I do
not len
n...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf
Of virginia
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:49 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: KR> Reduction Drive Unit
I like the idea of a reduction drive unit, to swing a larger, hence more
efficient prop. My concern is the ground clearnce, which
I have a 172 XP that has 11 inches of clearance and I feel thats cutting it
close.
---Original Message---
> From: Wood, Sidney M.
> Subject: RE: KR> Reduction Drive Unit
> Sent: 09 Jun 2004 12:28:38
>
> Tony Bengelis in his engine installation
Sid,
Is that tri or tail dragger.
Phillip Matheson
mathe...@dodo.com.au
Australia
VH PKR
See our engines and kits at.
http://www.vw-engines.com/
http://www.homebuilt-aviation.com/
See my KR at Mark Jones web
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/n886mj/pmkr2.html
Phil,
It does not matter whether tri or tail dragger. Tri-gear will be level and
tail dragger will be level on take off and landing. A hard landing will put
the prop down even more. Either way the prop will be mowing grass ( or dirt or
pavement) and throwing sand at the fuselage and tail if y
6 matches
Mail list logo
