If I'd bought an almost completed KR that didn't have an airworthiness
certificate yet, I'd go through every sqaure millimeter of the plane and
would thoroughly understand exactly how everything on it worked, and would
adjust it all so that it operated as flawlessly as possible. Then I'd fix
e
On 08/14/2009 04:43 PM, Ed Janssen wrote:
> I'm not sure about that. If the major part of the work was done before
> being acquired by Dave, there could be a problem convincing the inspector
> that he should be included as one of the original builders. Dave should
> probably check with his loc
Dj,
I'm not sure about that. If the major part of the work was done before
being acquired by Dave, there could be a problem convincing the inspector
that he should be included as one of the original builders. Dave should
probably check with his local FSDO before proceeding. Different FSDOs h
On 08/14/2009 12:42 PM, Ed Janssen wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Currently the regulations say that if the purpose is to operate an
> amateur-built aircraft, then the experimental certificate is issued to the
> original builder, the person(s) who did the major portion of the work
> (interpreted to be 51%).
Dave,
Currently the regulations say that if the purpose is to operate an
amateur-built aircraft, then the experimental certificate is issued to the
original builder, the person(s) who did the major portion of the work
(interpreted to be 51%). See FAR 21.191(g):
Experimental certificates are
5 matches
Mail list logo
