Stef den Boer wrote:
>>But what is the difference between the 2 and the -2S. We are building a -2
>>with the -S tail and stab. So what need I to do in the front of the
>>Fuselage. Prob some pics will help.<<
There is some reinforcement of the bracing for the firewall on the KR2S. I
feel sure
I think that the 2S had 4" added in front of the forward spar as well,
Virg
On 4/6/2011 8:57 AM, stef...@kpnmail.nl wrote:
> Thanks,
> We will build the fwd deck removable so that should not a problem. But what
> is the differents between the 2 and the -2S. We are building a -
Ted are building the KR-2S see
http://www.masttotaalconcept.nl/kr2
Van: krnet-bounces+stefkr2=kpnmail...@mylist.net namens velocityo...@yahoo.com
Verzonden: di 5-4-2011 16:24
Aan: KRnet
Onderwerp: Re: KR> RE: Firewall attachment
Sorry guys it sent bef
I swore I would never "instrument panel dive" again!
Do as Mark and many others have done, make the forward deck removable.
Phil Matheson
SAAA Ch 37
http://www.philskr2.50megs.com/
Sorry guys it sent before I was ready. Anyway the header tank removes allowing
complete access to the back of the panel, brakes, etc.
I can send pics when I get off work in three weeks if you are interested.
Victor Taylor
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:30 AM, "Teate, Stephen"
wrote
In regards to the access hole in the firewall I did something different. My
header tank is removable which allows j l
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:30 AM, "Teate, Stephen"
wrote:
> Hello Stef,
>
> If you are building a 2S then the firewall has already been reinforced for a
> 100
Hello Stef,
If you are building a 2S then the firewall has already been reinforced for a
100 HP engine. Actually the framing behind the firewall is what was changed.
The top cross beams and shelf were all increased and I believe the gussets are
also larger if I remember correctly. I will make o
7 matches
Mail list logo
