As Mark and others like to say, "your mileage may vary" as far as the FAA,
NTSB, or other agency's response to a flying accident or incident goes. My
response would be "it depends". My Pietenpol experienced carb ice and the carb
heat was too wimpy to deal with it, so the pilot (not me) put it
I was too. As soon as I got home from the hospital I got on the Web and
googled how to report an accident. Turns out there is a link on the NTSB page.
Basically here is what you do.
Contact the NTSB's 24-hour Response Operations Center (ROC) at 844-373-9922 to
file a report. A phone call is
I'm curious about this process. Does FAA have the airplane? How does that
work? What happens, and when after an off field landing with damage like
this? Did you call it into them right away? Who do you call, the FSDO?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:35 PM Randy Smith via KRnet
wrote:
> I will be
The FAA was here on Friday. We did remove the RH head and #1 cylinder. I plan
to document everything once the FAA and the NTSB are done with needing access
to the engine. I assume they are done but waiting an email from either NTSB or
FSDO. I want to get all the facts and lessons learned and
I will be surprised if the FAA does anything with the engine. I have been down
a few times with VW engines and all they said was it is an Experimental and
unless someone was seriously injured they really did not care to even look at
it.
On Monday, June 3, 2019, 9:37:45 AM CDT, Patrick via K
Craig,
Any results from the FAA teardown of the engine?
Patrick
On 2019-05-26 23:09, Craig Williams via KRnet wrote:
Too early to tell why the engine failed but the aircraft did not fair
well in the off airport landing. Details to follow. Training kicked
in at just the right moment.
Craig
Too early to tell why the engine failed but the aircraft did not fair well in
the off airport landing. Details to follow. Training kicked in at just the
right moment.
Craig
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krn
7 matches
Mail list logo
