KR> Experimental Amateur Built Certification/Repairman

2008-10-12 Thread Rich Seifert
safe operation. In the end, it doesn't take a smart person to find a way around the rule. It takes a smart person to know his limitations, to protect his butt, and not become another statistic. Just my opinion - Original Message - Subject: Re: KR> Experimental Amateur Built

KR> Experimental Amateur Built Certification/Repairman

2008-10-12 Thread Kenneth B. Jones
> rule. It takes a smart person to know his limitations, to protect his > butt, > and not become another statistic. > Just my opinion > - Original Message - > > Subject: Re: KR> Experimental Amateur Built Certification/Repairman > > >> My thoughts are that t

KR> Experimental Amateur Built Certification/Repairman

2008-10-12 Thread Rich Seifert
Thanks for the explanation Ken. Sorry I didn't pick that up the first time. - Original Message - From: "Kenneth B. Jones" To: "KRnet" Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 6:59 AM Subject: Re: KR> Experimental Amateur Built Certification/Repairman > >I

KR> Experimental Amateur Built Certification/Repairman

2008-10-12 Thread Kenneth B. Jones
My thoughts are that taking a KR-2 (or other) that is 99.99% complete and then completing it does not preclude certificating the aircraft as experimental amateur built. AC20-27F Appendix 1, definition of Major Portion, makes it crystal clear that you can count the construction efforts of previ