My thoughts are that taking a KR-2 (or other) that is 99.99% complete and 
then completing it does not preclude certificating the aircraft as 
experimental amateur built.  AC20-27F Appendix 1, definition of Major 
Portion, makes it crystal clear that you can count the construction efforts 
of previous builders.  This definition, although it does not specifically 
apply in AC65-23A, might be used as part of an arguement that you are the 
primary builder in your pursuit of the repairman certificate for this 
aircraft.  If you won this arguement, you would still have to "demonstrate 
to the certificating FAA inspector ....(your).... ability to perform 
condition inspections and to determine whether the subject aircraft is in a 
condition for safe operation."   I think this is normally "demonstrated" by 
showing your builder's log, but it seems this could be demonstrated some 
other way, for example, you built most of another KR and then sold it (and 
have evidence supporting that fact).   I don't know if there is anything 
that requires that you have built 51% to get the repairman certificate 
(Apparently not, because, if a group of people build a plane, one may be 
considered to become the repairman for that plane.)  It is clear, however, 
that you can get the airworthiness certificate without having built 51% 
yourself.  Much depends on your FAA office as well as the individuals 
supporting that office, especially if you are not armed with a knowledge of 
the regulations and other guidance material.

FURTHER READING-----(For more than you wanted to know.)

Read AC 65-23A & AC 20-27F (You should read these documents if you are 
contemplating building and becoming the repairman for an experimental 
amateur built airplane.)

References in the regs (65.104) and the AC (65.23A, paragraph 6.c) both use 
the words "primary builder".  To me, primary could mean first, one who did 
the most, or the one who's taking responsibility for the whole thing.  In 
this case I tend toward the last one as he is the person taking all the 
responsibility and getting the airworthiness certificate and the excerpt 
below from AC 65-23A requires that application for repairman be made at the 
time of original certification of the aircraft.  AC 65-23A, 6.c., gives some 
examples of primary builder.  Also see the definition for "Major Portion" AC 
20-27F, Appendix 1.

>From AC 65-23A
6 ELIGIBILITY.
An individual desiring to be certificated as a repairman is required to:

a. Make application for a repairman certificate (experimental aircraft
builder) at the time of original certification of the aircraft. Builders who
have had their aircraft certificated prior to the effective date (September 
10,
1979) of revised FAR Section 21.181(a)(3) and new FAR Section 65.104 may 
make
application for repairman certification prior to the next condition 
inspection
due date.

b. Be a U.S. citizen or an individual of a foreign country who has been
for permanent residence in the United States.

c. Be 18 years of age or older, and the primary builder of the aircraft.
For example, when a school, club, or partnership builds an aircraft, only 
one
individual will be considered for a repairman certificate for each aircraft
built, such as the class instructor or designated project leader.

d. demonstrate to the certificating FAA inspector his or her ability to
perform condition inspections and to determine whether the subject aircraft 
is in a concition for safe operation.

>From AC 20-27F Appendix 1
Major Portion. When the aircraft is completed, the majority of the 
fabrication and assembly tasks have
been performed by the amateur builder. >>>>>> When you purchase a partially 
completed kit or aircraft, the
major portion includes the construction efforts of the previous amateur 
builders.<<<<<<<

 Ken Jones, kenbjo...@cinci.rr.com
Sharonville, OH
N5834, aka The Porkopolis Flying Pig


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Deb Unternaehrer" <deb...@mcmsys.com>
> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: KR> KR2 on eBay
>
>
>> I think this is one of those "problem childs" according to the FAA.  You
>> can't register it Exp, amateur built, because you can't prove you built 
>> it
>> (51% rule) and it stalls to fast to meet Sport Pilot rules.  Bob U.
>>




Reply via email to