KR> Court post

2008-10-12 Thread Colin & Bev Rainey
Not to invite a huge discussion on this, and at the risk of over simplifying the situation, from what I read the decision from the court revolved around 2 factors: first what were the original limitations spelled out by the DAR/FAA certifying authority; second what constituted a modification tha

KR> Court post

2008-10-12 Thread F Ross
I was surprised that it didn't matter that he returned the plane to it's original, certified condition. Once he made the FIRST change from the certified condition, according to his insurance contract, he lost his insurance coverage until his changes, even putting it back the original way, were re-

KR> Court post - Avemco

2008-10-12 Thread Kevin Jarvis
Guys, This is s simple. First, in the contract with Avemco or any other insurer, it's all in there in black and white. (I do not work for them). It is not an issue that you didn't see it or didn't know about it and "well, I thought.." just won't cut it, it just doesn't matter what