Mark L. has the prints on his website. I put them on a disk and took it to
Kinkos and paid $10.00 to have them printed full scale.
Pat Driscoll
Saint Paul, MN
patric...@usfamily.net
LIFE MAY NOT BE THE PARTY WE HOPED FOR
BUT WHILE WE ARE HERE WE MIGHT AS WELL DANCE!"
--- http://USFamily
"
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: KR> AS504x airfoil
> Mark L. has the prints on his website. I put them on a disk and took it to
> Kinkos and paid $10.00 to have them printed full scale.
> Pat Driscoll
> Saint Paul, MN
> patric...@usfamily.net
> LIF
aerobeale wrote:
> I'm currently building a KR2S and I'm about to put the vertical member in
the fusalge that the main and rear spar go through. I tried to download the
blue print for the AS504X wing how ever they were so small that I couldn't
read off the paper.
If you take it to somebody with
Jim wrote: Downloaded wing airfoils and took to Kinko's. Could not read them.
Jim,
try to put them on a disk and then open the disk on your computer. If you
enlarge the picture on your computer and can read the print in any area, then
the problem is with Kinko's. If you can't read them, you h
"
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: KR> AS504x airfoil
> aerobeale wrote:
>
>> I'm currently building a KR2S and I'm about to put the vertical member in
> the fusalge that the main and rear spar go through. I tried to down
aerobeale wrote:
> Thanks the diagonal pieces I m taking about are the 5/8 X 5/8 fore and aft
> of the spar slots. Ive know the two on top load carring wouldnt be
installed
> untill spar compleation and installed the airfoil Im wanting to use is the
> AS5048
That's what I was talking about when
this
thing wont get me what I need. Ill send it right back to you when I gleen
the infomation off Thank you
Jim Beale
3015 W Bluebird
Wichita Ks 67204
Thanks again
- Original Message -
From: "Pat Driscoll"
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 10:48 PM
Sub
Jim wrote:
Thank you The computer is brand new however we have been having a few
little gliches with it and this maybe one of them weve stumped Dell a couple
of times. I know we must have some real problems because even my kids can
get that to make a readable print . Sure would apperiate a di
>Jim wrote:
>Thank you The computer is brand new however we have been having a few
>little gliches with it and this maybe one of them weve stumped Dell a couple
>of times.
>Hey Jim,
>I had the same problem with the disc that I downloaded. The solution for me
>was this:
My problem was the op
I'm currently building a KR2S and I'm about to put the vertical member in the
fusalge that the main and rear spar go through. I tried to download the blue
print for the AS504X wing how ever they were so small that I couldn't read off
the paper.
Which airfoil has been used the most, and how high
Gene Leone wrote:
> I'm building the KR-1. The 504x airfoil has been
> discussed for the KR-2S. How compatible, I wonder, is this airfoil with
the
> KR-1?
The AS504x certainly wasn't designed for the KR-1, but it can't be any worse
match for it than the RAF48 is. I would expect the same decre
Thanks for the info'! I just wanted to be sure before building it.
Gene Leone,
Worland, Wyoming
---Original Message---
From: KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 04/19/04 16:55:10
To: KRnet
Subject: @SPAM+ Re: KR> AS504x airfoil
Gene Leone wrote:
> I
Someone said - (sorry i did not follow completely)
OK for a wing root but will be a poor choice for a control surface.
>Aileron control forces will be high. It is a less than optimum choice for
>an airfoil that is intended to be laminar over a wide range angle of
>attack.
So is it tested and un
At 10:38 PM 4/12/2004, you wrote:
>OK for a wing root but will be a poor choice for a control surface.
> >Aileron control forces will be high.
>So is it tested and understood that the farther out on the wing, the less of
>this "cusp or tuck" the better, as far as on the aileron goes? Has this
>be
>> Has this been proven on other airfoils? Would you fill in the tuck,
>> keeping the cord the same?
I recall a report on the first Netter to try the new wing section - he
seemed pretty pleased after the first few flights - has anyone asked him
lately with these specifics in mind?
Steve J
Hi Gang
I down loaded the profilli software as suggested by steve J - brilliant - I
will send the owner the $10 or whatever to get the full version.
I figured steve was talking through his neck - P51 wing sectrion - oh yeah -
well I the P51 section is there and I did the comparrison he reccomen
>> I figured steve was talking through his neck - P51 wing section
>> oh yeah - well I the P51 section is there and I did the
>> comparrison he recommended - P51 against the AS 5046 - amazing
similarity
Hey Monkey - no upper case on your KB
Was gonna comment on your great spelling ability
The many discussions about various airfoils and the Ashok ones, plus the
recent discussion about the cusp, cause me to recommend highly to all list
members, a book by Harry Riblett entitled GA AIRFOILS, A Catalog
of Airfoils For General Aviation Use. It is available as part number
13-18725 from Air
You can also type in X/Y coordinates to modify a copy of an included
airfoil. Just key over what's there to put in the coordinates for some
airfoil not in Profili and it will render that airfoil.
-Lloyd Schultz
=
Stephen Jacobs wrote:
> >> I figured
omely?
Because Janet Reno is her real father.
---Original Message---
From: KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 04/16/04 07:19:42
To: gle...@rtconnect.net
Subject: @SPAM+ Re: KR> AS504x airfoil
You can also type in X/Y coordinates to modify a copy of an included
airfo
Hello all - my first appearance
The AS504x airfoil sections appear to be a big improvement over the RAF48.
I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing edge - the
last few mm seem to droop down leaving a concave area right at the back
(underneath).
One builder site I visited s
Ronald Metcalf wrote:
> I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing edge - the
> last few mm seem to droop down leaving a concave area right at the back
> (underneath).
I'm not sure what the question is, but I can tell you that the Lionheart was
originally designed using NACA 64
>Ronald Metcalf wrote:
>>> I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing edge - the
>> last few mm seem to droop down leaving a concave area right at the back
>> (underneath).
+++
>I'm not sure what the question is, but I can tell you that
> "Ronald Metcalf" writes:
> The AS504x airfoil sections appear to be a big improvement
> over the RAF48.
> I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing
> edge - the last few mm seem to droop down leaving a
> concave area right at the back (underneath).
FWIW, the old Maloof c/
At 09:57 PM 4/11/2004, you wrote:
> > "Ronald Metcalf" writes:
> > The AS504x airfoil sections appear to be a big improvement
> > over the RAF48.
> > I am interested in the strange "tuck" underneath the trailing
> > edge - the last few mm seem to droop down leaving a
> > concave area right at the
>That trailing edge cusp does several different things. the pitch moment
>will be more negative
>boundary layer separation will tend to stay closer to the trailing edge
>coefficient of lift of the two different airfoils the same, but the
>cusped airfoil will reach it
>at lower angle of atta
26 matches
Mail list logo
