KR> Reaming WAFs

2015-08-30 Thread John Bouyea
Don Reid wrote back in 2007 that the WAF bolts function better as a single bolt in double shear top & bottom (2 total) than 2 on each fitting, forward and aft, top & bottom (4 total). I know that KRs fly in both configurations. My KR used 4 per side when I got it and (partially based upon Don's wel

KR> Reaming WAFs

2015-08-30 Thread Mark Langford
Nobody's shown me a torque for KR wing attach fittings. It's not in the plans. Why is that? Because friction was not even considered in the analysis of the wing attach joint. It was a pure shear calculation. It's simply a pinned joint, and safe enough on that basis alone. Although I'm certai

KR> Reaming WAFs

2015-08-30 Thread Flesner
At 02:51 PM 8/30/2015, you wrote: >Ignoring clamping friction in a bolted shear joint calculation seems >to be a worst case analysis in that the assumption is: the bolts are >torqued just enough to keep from rattling around. The total load >then would be applied in shear to the bolt. That assu

KR> Reaming WAFs

2015-08-30 Thread Sid Wood
Ignoring clamping friction in a bolted shear joint calculation seems to be a worst case analysis in that the assumption is: the bolts are torqued just enough to keep from rattling around. The total load then would be applied in shear to the bolt. That assumption does not seem realistic for pra

KR> Reaming WAFs

2015-08-30 Thread jon kimmel
Torque is only for keeping the nuts from backing off...it is much better than lockouts. https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/ https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/parts-for-sale

KR> Reaming WAFs

2015-08-30 Thread Chris Kinnaman
No one in their right mind would deliberately put a shear joint assembly together without proper torqueing on the bolts. Streamlined flying wires are installed in exactly that manner, with a clevis pin, not a bolt, in shear bearing the tension load of the wire. The clevis pin is retained by