Torque reaction is common in any reciprocating system. Generally speaking,
you get torque reaction when the rotating mass is changing velocity
(applying throttle would be an example). I am more familiar with high
performance cars and motorcycles, but the energy (torque) has to have
something to rea
Anyone who has done some searching on the net for KRs knows that there are
several airplanes - antiques and such -that use the letters "KR" in their
model names - and are completely different than the little Ken Rand
homebuilt airplanes. Some have some pretty big engines where torque roll
disc
I have a standard KR2 with 100 HP with 1.6: 1 belt drive. 60 inch blade prop
and NEVER experienced at problem after take off. She fly's like nothing
else. Beautiful.
The only problem is keeping her straight with full Right rudder plus R brake
till about 20 to 25 knots due to that extra torque.
The other thing to consider too, is that at first it might seem cheaper, but
when you are done with it all, the Subie will cost you more than Vair. I've
heard anything from 12K to 15K if you are buying a PSRU and doing most the
other work yourself.
And don't forget, just because it has radiators t
I've built two of these types of doors for my hangars, although mine were home
built from plans and locally purchased parts. The first is 40' wide by 9'6"
tall and the second is 48' wide by 10'6" tall. Both are quick to roll up and
down for quick, easy access to my planes and plenty stout to
So basically what im getting out of most people is that the Vair is better
in the long run as far as torque and power vs. weight and power. Subes
might be fine if I was just chugging around the southwest but I planned on
long
distance. Thanks for all your opinions and links to help my decisi
I found this on hanger doors in case someone else is interested.
http://ultimatedoor.homestead.com/ultimate.html
Regards,
Myron (Dan) Freeman
Indpls, Ind. 46203-3570
Home of the Indy 500,
the World's most famous
auto race.
mfreem...@indy.rr.com
Check out and join the
the
Dave,
I know of five KRSuper2 builders that will be at Oshkosh. I think all are
planning on using the Corvair. They are myself, Chris Anderson, Paul
Fincato,
David McCauley and Ted Sanders. Scott Watts can not make it this year, but
passed these names on to me. Let us meet at the KR Forum on Mo
Hi all,
I'm starting to build the instrument panel.
Of course, there are always questions that pops up, where the answer is
dependant on a lot of variables. I plan to build the panel from 3mm (might
be 2.8, I'm not sure) plywood, and I need to know what thickness is required
to ensure the panel
"This is an obvious attempt at humor or Mike is smoking something. An
R-985
on a KR 2? Yea, right."
I didn't even think about the humor angle Larry and I hope you are
right. I will never believe that my Sube will ever cause a torque issue
as the vast majority of my trailing edges is made up of
[quote] I would have to say an engine that weighs more than the aircraft
itself is very unlikely. Not to mention how would one build a KR with enough
ground clearance for that 10 foot prop an R-985 has to swing?
Kind of reminds me of the Gee Bee Racer.
?Regards,
Myron (Dan) Freeman
In
I would have to say an engine that weighs more than the aircraft itself is
very unlikely. Not to mention how would one build a KR with enough ground
clearance for that 10 foot prop an R-985 has to swing?
My guess is it is some sort of typo on Wiki.
A P&W R-985 weighs in at something around 650 to
Hi, interesting, on Wiki it is mentioned that the R-985 is used on the
KR-range of experimentals.
Regards.
JC
Disclaimer; Yada yada yada...
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf
Of Larry&Sallie Flesner
Sent: 09 July 2009 14:22
To:
At 01:18 AM 7/9/2009, you wrote:
>Probably the biggest reason to avoid higher-powered engines in KR's is
>the problem with immediate and fatal torque rolls once the wheels leave
>the runway.
> Among those first fatalities was Homer Didit of Mena, Arkansas
>who put that R-985 in his KR-2. He only
I have built up a small but complete flight testing regime on two different
KR-2's and have never had anything remotely like a torque induced tendency
to roll. Both of my planes have extra engine. One is a Subaru, and it is
as tame and gentle as a little girl, the other has a Saturn engine and it
I do believe that the Sube will runs more economically then the 'vair up
to a point.
The extra weight will require more fuel to pull the plane through the
air and depending on the engine and the amount of power it's putting
out, it will probably turn out fairly equally.
On a related note regardi
Isn't the Subaru, water cooled? Water cooled engines will run much more
economically than will air cooled. Air cooled engines use air, oil, and
fuel to keep them cool. So I have heard.
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics
See you at the 2009 - KR Gathering in Mt. Vernon,
17 matches
Mail list logo
