Mark Langford wrote:
> Please consider this carefully. 5-500 tires look (and are) pretty huge on a
> KR. I have the "standard" 11x4.0-5 Lamb tires, on 5-500 wheels, and that
> works fine. I fly in and out of grass strips a lot with this setup
> (including wheel pants) and it's just not a prob
I just received a set of osprey2 plans. I bought them to check out the
retractable mains. I have not yet audited the dimensions, but it looks
doable.. Their nosewheel design won't fit of course, so I am still
searching for that solution.
Looks like each main strut "working load" load is 1100 lb
Glenn Martin wrote:
> I am also going to remove the old retractable
> landing gear and install fixed gear, disk brakes and 5-500 tires. bigger
> tires are safer on wet grass strips.
Please consider this carefully. 5-500 tires look (and are) pretty huge on a
KR. I have the "standard" 11x4.0-5 L
pshows wrote:
> I need a set of WAFs for one wing for a 2s, anybody got some?
> IHS
> PatS
> Seminary, MS
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please
I need a set of WAFs for one wing for a 2s, anybody got some?
IHS
PatS
Seminary, MS
I have read that using the WAF's to make the plane portable is not a
good idea as the bolts, washers and nuts will eventually wear out the
WAF's. That makes sense. I would think a good solution ,and easy to do
would be to make the holes in the WAF's larger, and use bushings in
those holes
Please read -
At the bottom of every post it tells how its done.
- Original Message -
From: "george anderson"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:39 PM
Subject: KR> un-subscribe
Please take me off the address list.
Thank you, andr...@sbcglobal.net
__
Please take me off the address list.
Thank you, andr...@sbcglobal.net
At 07:22 AM 4/1/2009, you wrote:
>"I did have to change the cable attach points
>on my bell cranks to achieve the called for travel."
>Larry Flesner
>++
>There is one photo of your aileron bracket under your project on the KR
>internet list. It
"I did have to change the cable attach points
on my bell cranks to achieve the called for travel."
Larry Flesner
There is one photo of your aileron bracket under your project on the KR
internet list. It looks like a stock bracket with the exception of the
attachment of the crossover cable. Is
>
>
> Mark, Jones wrote: My belcranks are set up where they can be set either
>way. When I
>made my first flights, I had them set for equal travel and I liked the way
>they responded so I never changed them to the offset travel.
This is kinda directed to Mark Langford, do you have your
bellcran
Eric Von Kelsheimer wrote:
> This is kinda directed to Mark Langford, do you have your
> belcranks set up like Mark Jones's are or at the +20 -10 as per plans? If
> they are set to plan's have you guys compared flight charicteristics of
> the
> two planes? It would be interesting to have a compar
This is kinda directed to Mark Langford, do you have your
belcranks set up like Mark Jones's are or at the +20 -10 as per plans? If
they are set to plan's have you guys compared flight charicteristics of the
two planes? It would be interesting to have a comparison of the two fo
>Hi Guys,
>I'm trying to sort out aileron travel. In the construction manual there is
>a dwg of the aileron bell crank.
The design of the travel is to help a KR turn without a lot of rudder input.
With the +20 -10 set up, the aileron that is deflected more will actually
have more drag into the
14 matches
Mail list logo
