Hi,
My kr-2 got it's airworthyness cert, and operating limitations back in
the 1980's.
Now with a new motor, canopy, fordeck and cowl, I am sure they will want
me to fly off 40 hours in addition to the 22 already logged.
What abot the ELT? It has none now. No mention of one in the logs.
What do
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:33:49 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) "Dan Heath"
writes:
> I noticed on Jeff's web site that the Cont cannot take advantage of
having a
> crossover. They claim that the VW can, I wonder why? Also, I have
noticed
> that the Vairs don't use crossover. Is this just for conv
I noticed on Jeff's web site that the Cont cannot take advantage of having a
crossover. They claim that the VW can, I wonder why? Also, I have noticed
that the Vairs don't use crossover. Is this just for convenience, or does
the same apply?
Speaking of progress, my engine bottom end is at Roy's
Jeff - if the exhaust isn't spoken for - I could be interested. Probably be
better than the Champ exhaust I'm running now.
Rick Human
N202RH
Houston, Texas
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: KR> exhausting progress?
I slapped together
Scroll down to BLUE (U.S. Visiting Over/flying Aircraft)
Update on 406 ELTs - Our Sector Must Equip
By Kevin Psutka COPA (CDN AOPA)
December 12, 2008
I will cut to the chase. We are at the end of the long battle to bring
common sense to this issue.
Common sense has not prevailed.
Transport Ca
5 matches
Mail list logo
