Hi,
Le 1 mai 2015 11:15, "Pali Rohár" a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> this year for Google Summer of Code 2015 we selected and accepted
> these 4 Kopete projects:
>
> (abb) project - student
>
> (IRC) IRC Protocol for Kopete - Akshay Ratan
> (KF5) Port Kopete to KF5 - rharish
> (HIS) Kopete: Improved Hi
Hi,
If a mentor is missing like last year, I propose myself with the same
conditions.
Cheers,
Michel
Le 18 mars 2016 11:22 AM, "R.Harish Navnit" a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Narek Babajanyan <
> narek_babajan...@edu.aua.am> wrote:
>
>> Greetings everyone,
>>
>> I'm writi
Hi,
I think you should follow
https://community.kde.org/Infrastructure/Get_a_Contributor_Account .
Don't forget to put Pali and me as supporters (should help reduce
sysadmin burden)
Le 28/04/2016 à 12:34, Harsh Shah a écrit :
Hello ,
My name is Harsh Shah. So My GSOC project is IRC protoco
Hi,
Please describe the problem.
Le 28 avr. 2016 17:49, "Harsh Shah" a écrit :
> hello,
>
> I am facing problem to create developer account because of SSH key I don't
> understand of creating SSH I read the document but facing problem please
> help me on this.
>
>
>
> [image: --]
> Harsh Shah
>
You finished successfully the execution of: ssh-keygen -t dsa
Le 28/04/2016 à 19:39, Harsh Shah a écrit :
i try to create using ssh key but not understanding how i
follow process but not get result .
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Michel Hermier
mailto:michel.herm...@gmail.com>>
Ok we have to wait for administrators then I guess ;)
Le 28/04/2016 à 20:04, Harsh Shah a écrit :
I submitted developer application just check out .
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-deve
Replied to sysadmin email, processus will continue.
Le 28 avr. 2016 20:24, "Michel Hermier" a écrit :
> Ok we have to wait for administrators then I guess ;)
>
> Le 28/04/2016 à 20:04, Harsh Shah a écrit :
>
>> I submitted develope
Hi,
This email is meant for irc soc student, and sent to public ml for
transparency.
Read carefully at those 2 links, they describe the code of conduct when
submitting code. And as you can see, if you don't follow them can cause you
some troubles. Don't be afraid but it is made so the workflow is
Hi,
I spoke with the administrative, your KDE account is still a no go, because
of a to young implication.
You can go optionally cloning in your github.
But you have to use the reviewboard workflow, which will be also something
new for me.
Cheers,
Michel
Le 30 avr. 2016 4:14 PM, "R.Harish Navni
Hi,
AFAIK it is (was) highly recommended. So there is a public progress trace.
Cheers,
Michel
Le 3 mai 2016 7:22 PM, "Akshay Ratan" a écrit :
Hi Harsh,
Congratulations for GSOC firstly. In regards to your question, there is no
compulsion to maintain a blog, but sure it's a good habit and a re
Hi,
Do you have some any progress to report for your GSoC ? I don't see you
login on IRC and I'm worried.
Cheers,
Michel
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
Hi,
Show the code somehow, we don't care if it does not compile as this, but at
least we can can monitor your progress and guide you.
I can respond to you on IRC or hangout with some delay but I actively
monitor them (hangout is on my personal phone so I can answer almost all
day long with some lit
Hi,
I was the rewriter of the last IRC protocol. It is a mess due to the fact
that I tried to circumvent some of the problem regarding automation of
replies user feed back.
I don't know know if the project is still alive, but maybe you should try
to look at the other IRC program/stack. IMO, It sho
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131372
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2006-09-12 12:55
---
Replacing '<' with '>' doesn't
Replacing '<' with '>' doesn't help ?
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134058
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2006-09-14 13:22
---
What do you mean by log ? Chat/
Ok so it would be an extension to the history plugin (if not
implemented allready implemented)
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134058
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2006-09-17 01:06
---
Ok so it would be an extension
It should work, if you get the green screen, it's probably because you
have a problem with the overlay. Can you try to check if overlay is
working correctly with your card ?
2006/9/17, Philox / Jonathan Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to get my Logitech Quickcam Fusion to wo
/ Jonathan Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michel Hermier wrote:
> > It should work, if you get the green screen, it's probably because you
> > have a problem with the overlay. Can you try to check if overlay is
> > working correctly with your card ?
>
> Starti
I just read it all (was long) and seems good to me.
If commited please commit kopete / libkopete and each portocol, one by
one so one can revert (some errors may be related to imported external
sources).
Anyway, wait for more comments.
Michel
2006/9/24, Brian Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached i
This patch is not necessary, KSharedPtr does the check for us.
Anyway any help is really welcome.
Michel
2006/10/2, Rafael Fernández López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry for that patch. It was just wrong. Sorry.
>
> Bye,
> Rafael Fernández López.
___
This is due to an unhandled message, due to automatic online presence checks.
Do you have information (at least the name) on the server you are
connected to ? So that we can handle this message correctly.
Michel
2006/10/4, Andrey A. Ugolnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello!
>
> When i have IRC chat w
Seems fine, after that can you clean the AddAccountWizard constructor params ?
It seems that name and modal are not used anymore, and I wonder of the
real interest of the firstrun argument (is it really used ?)
Michel
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete
It sounds correct.
But I think that the last the firstrun parameter should go to a
setter/getter. So that we fallow the Qt QWidget default constructor
rule (to allow to have it in a plugin). Comments ?
Michel
2006/10/11, Rafael Fernández López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi folks,
>
> I got 10 minutes
Maybe it can be an interesting krazy check ?
Michel
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
I think it's better to have it as an attribute (can be a little more
complicated). Since if move that code to a plugin, we may need to be
able to control the behaviour from designer, and more importantly we
need to be able to use it depending on the configuration (I think).
The next step would be t
For me the bench is wrong, since the method signatures are not comparable.
And I find it normal that it's more harder to parse the second one
since there are more needed spaces and characters.
Do you have results with the same signatures, but one with nominal,
and the other with some extra spaces ?
I commited the first patch, since it looks much what I thinks is good.
If you have time, think about making the last bool an attribute.
Michel
2006/10/11, Rafael Fernández López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In that case somebody should update the patch that you want (the one with 2
> parameters in cons
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136023
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2006-10-20 15:45
---
How do you reach this menu ?
I'
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135397
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115796
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135616
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136021
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133150
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134369
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
I think it's a kdelibs problem related to the desktop you use.
What is your desktop ? (I suspect gnome since you are using ubuntu and
not kubuntu)
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136208
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2006-10-23 23:15
---
I think it's a kdelibs problem
When configuring the package, use --enable-debug=full
And when running it starting it withing gdb use --nofork.
Cheers,
Michel
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
Arrff, seems I squashed the bug locally with few changes, but it seems
there is a problem within Qt.
In this context:
Widget *w = new Widget();
Layout *l = new Layout(w);
Doing:
new Widget(w);
seems not equivalent to do:
l->addWidget(new Widget());
Anyway this file needs to be clean
with the tab
version I think and other).
Michel
2006/10/27, Michel Hermier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Arrff, seems I squashed the bug locally with few changes, but it seems
there is a problem within Qt.
In this context:
Widget *w = new Widget();
Layout *l = new Layout(w);
Doing:
new Wi
code unreadable at first.
Should I commit my patch even if incomplete ?
Michel
2006/10/27, Matt Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 27 October 2006 01:33, Michel Hermier wrote:
> > Arrff, seems I squashed the bug locally with few changes, but it seems
> > there i
Hi,
kernel includes from what kernel ?
There is a known bug in some of the 2.6.x kernel series which don't
define the integer 64 types with strict ansi, and guess what, KDE is
compiled in strict ansi.
cheers,
Michel
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kop
2006/11/12, Klaus Weidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> > kernel includes from what kernel ?
> You mean the kernel header files? I have installed the Slackware package:
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-i386-1
> The kernel (2.6.18) is self compiled.
This is the good package, it contains the kernel stuff
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137567
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137567
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hi,
Fixed in trunk, thanks for the report.
Michel
Roberto Nibali wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> I normally do not get around much in user space code, let alone in a
> monstrosity like KDE. However, a recent posting to the kernel mailing
> list caught my attention, which I should like to direct
Tako Schotanus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is probably a stupid question for most people here but I thought
> I'd try to find the problem for which I just entered a report (#138248
> : Large message in IRC are cut off).
>
> So I got the code from SVN, configured with debugging and a prefix
> pointing to
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz a écrit :
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 00:12, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
>
>> ../../libkopete/libkopete.la .libs/detectornetworkstatus.o: In function
>> `DetectorNetworkStatus':
>> /home/users/arekm/rpm/BUILD/kdenetwork-3.5.5/kopete/plugins/smpppdcs/detect
>> ornetworkst
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139570
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139569
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140025
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142988
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138494
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135818
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136184
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137443
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139529
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139966
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139969
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139988
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140149
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140366
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112831
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2007-04-11 13:24
---
For which protocol ?
__
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143971
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143473
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143586
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143772
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143835
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143861
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144198
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144094
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144094
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2007-04-14 10:16
---
Un-attach the stack trace, (so
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144275
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123286
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
michel.hermier gmail com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130616
--- Additional Comments From michel.hermier gmail com 2006-07-11 14:32
---
The entry was moved in the KDE
Hi,
I don't really see the interest of the information zone.
When we want info about a given user, we only have to hove the
name/picture of it.
And if the plugin want to send us information, it only have to send
internal messages.
I don't really see something informations to give to the user that
>
> from a usability perspective, a tab bar would suck. given that a chat
> application should focus on chat, having such a weighty bit of UI would
> detract from the focus. kopete could really use less rather than more UI.
>
> what about having a single viewport with the ability to have multiple e
> I wanna discus what would be best for Kopete contact list Model-Storage
> interface.
> With Michael Larouche we agreed we'll be using "friend classes" to not bloat
> the public API of MetaContact/Group.
> Now with friend classes we have two possibilities.
>
> First: add friend keyword to MetaCo
Hi,
I would like to propose the separation of libkopete in to part.
The libkopete (core) which would contains the core objects.
And libkopeteui which would contains all the gui stuff from
libkopete/ui, libkopete/private, libkopete/avdevice and some of the
kopete application ui (for the default ui)
Try to make a real clean, make clean may not be enought, cmake is a
retard sometimes.
Else you probabily triggered a bug with kde4_install_libtool_file
because of one of the option you use.
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.k
2006/8/6, Olivier Goffart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello.
>
> So we are going soon or later to drop the Q3ListView stuff for the
> contactlist.
>
> I have made an experimental contactlist using QAbstractItemModel.
>
> I have to say i'm still not convinced by the supposed advantage of
> QAbstractItem
>
> >
> > So do we have a real interest in such features, I would say yes,
> > because you can also add some filter model layers. And this is
> > interesting by example for the chat lists.
>
> That's an interesting point.
> Could we share the main contactlist model with the chatwindow member list
>
> > For me what you wrote is the way to go. Only one final comment. Make
> > an intermediate Kopete::AbstractContactTreeViewModel, and use this
> > intermediate in all the views.
> > So that we could provide the real and direct
> > Kopete::ContactTreeViewModel and maybe somewhere else the
> > Kopet
2006/8/7, Matt Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sunday 06 August 2006 02:09, Michel Hermier wrote:
> > 2006/8/6, Olivier Goffart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > So we are going soon or later to drop the Q3ListView stuff for t
2006/8/7, Matt Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 07 August 2006 01:12, Michel Hermier wrote:
> > 2006/8/7, Matt Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Sunday 06 August 2006 02:09, Michel Hermier wrote:
> > > > 2006/8/6, Olivier Go
2006/8/14, Olivier Goffart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gi
>
> Le dimanche 13 août 2006 23:35, Michel Hermier a écrit:
> > SVN commit 572760 by hermier:
> >
> > Make Kopete::Contact also a child a Kopete::ContactListElement.
>
> What is the interest of that ?
2006/8/14, Olivier Goffart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le lundi 14 août 2006 09:15, Michel Hermier a écrit:
>
> > The thing is that Kopete::Group Kopete::MetaContact and Kopete::Contact
> > should share the same base.
>
> I don't see a reason.
> They already sha
90 matches
Mail list logo
