I'm agreeing with Brooke, who agrees with Marc V., who agrees with
Katrin...
*D Ruth Bavousett*
Lead Migration Specialist
ByWater Solutions
Support and Consulting for Open Source Software
Headquarters: Santa Barbara, CA
Office: Lawrence, KS
Phone/Fax (888)900-8944
http://bywatersolutions.com
r...@
>
> Am 24.10.2012 16:53, schrieb Fischer, Katrin:
> Hi all,
>
> I think so far we have a lot of votes for keeping the discussion on the
> Koha developer mailing list so it looks to me like this is what we should
> do. Also a +1 from me. I think Mirko made a good point that it is
> interesting for
Salvete!
>I agree with Marc V. agreeing with Katrin. :)
Oh yeah, well I triple dog agree with you.
I think a separate list might slightly hinder a would be bug wrangler.
nofences++
Cheers,
Brooke
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@l
I agree with Marc V. agreeing with Katrin. :)
Ian
On Oct 24, 2012 11:11 AM, "Marc Véron" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I agree with Katrin in both points.
>
> Marc V.
>
>
>
> Am 24.10.2012 16:53, schrieb Fischer, Katrin:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think so far we have a lot of votes for keeping the discussion
Hi all,
I agree with Katrin in both points.
Marc V.
Am 24.10.2012 16:53, schrieb Fischer, Katrin:
Hi all,
I think so far we have a lot of votes for keeping the discussion on the
Koha developer mailing list so it looks to me like this is what we should
do. Also a +1 from me. I think Mirko ma
ople helping out are subscribed
there.
Katrin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org im Auftrag von Jared
Camins-Esakov
Gesendet: Mi 24.10.2012 16:42
An: Paul Poulain
Cc: Koha Devel
Betreff: Re: [Koha-devel] Some thoughts from QA team
Paul,
Every
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Paul Poulain
wrote:
> Le 24/10/2012 11:52, Chris Cormack a écrit :
> Everybody says +1 to your counter-proposal, but we already have a
> koha-translate mailing list, dedicated to translation questions. And a
> koha-zebra one that is almost unused, but exist.
Paul,
Everybody says +1 to your counter-proposal, but we already have a
> koha-translate mailing list, dedicated to translation questions. And a
> koha-zebra one that is almost unused, but exist.
>
I am of the opinion we should close the koha-zebra list, at least. It just
means more mailing lists
Le 24/10/2012 11:52, Chris Cormack a écrit :
> And if they are patch specific then on the bug itself makes more sense.
> I'd definitely like to see any qa discussions public, but I don't see
> the need for a new list .. am I missing something?
Everybody says +1 to your counter-proposal, but we al
Greetings,
if people are OK with having the QA-team discuss their stuff
on the koha-devel list, then i am happy
(we could prefix the QA email's subject with 'QA: ',
so people can ignore them easily, if they want too)
are people OK with this?
Yes, +1 to QA tagged subject lines and discussing o
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Jared Camins-Esakov
wrote:
>
>> > if people are OK with having the QA-team discuss their stuff on the
>> > koha-devel list, then i am happy
>> > (we could prefix the QA email's subject with 'QA: ', so people can
>> > ignore them easily, if they want too)
>> >
> +1
> > if people are OK with having the QA-team discuss their stuff on the
koha-devel list, then i am happy
> > (we could prefix the QA email's subject with 'QA: ', so people can
ignore them easily, if they want too)
> >
+1
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-d
>> (we could prefix the QA email's subject with 'QA: ', so people can ignore
>> them easily, if they want too)
>>
>> are people OK with this?
+1
-- Owen
--
Web Developer
Athens County Public Libraries
http://www.myacpl.org
___
Koha-devel mailing lis
On 24 October 2012 12:49, Mason James wrote:
> if people are OK with having the QA-team discuss their stuff on the
> koha-devel list, then i am happy
> (we could prefix the QA email's subject with 'QA: ', so people can ignore
> them easily, if they want too)
>
>
> are people OK with this?
+1
M
Mason James schrieb
> if people are OK with having the QA-team discuss their stuff on
> the koha-devel list, then i am happy (we could prefix the QA
> email's subject with 'QA: ', so people can ignore them easily, if
> they want too)
>
>
> are people OK with this?
I am. And I think anyone on the
On 2012-10-24, at 10:52 PM, Chris Cormack wrote:
> On 24 October 2012 22:47, Paul Poulain wrote:
>> Hi koha-devel,
>>
>> The 3.10 and 3.12 QA teams ( Mason, Jonathan, Marcel & me, with the
>> freshly elected Travis, Katrin -and Jared as RM-) have had a discussion
>> about QA process and would l
On 24 October 2012 22:47, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Hi koha-devel,
>
> The 3.10 and 3.12 QA teams ( Mason, Jonathan, Marcel & me, with the
> freshly elected Travis, Katrin -and Jared as RM-) have had a discussion
> about QA process and would like to propose the 2 following things:
>
> * Create a QA s
Hi koha-devel,
The 3.10 and 3.12 QA teams ( Mason, Jonathan, Marcel & me, with the
freshly elected Travis, Katrin -and Jared as RM-) have had a discussion
about QA process and would like to propose the 2 following things:
* Create a QA specific mailing list (q...@lists.koha-community.org ?)
This
18 matches
Mail list logo
