On 2012-10-24, at 10:52 PM, Chris Cormack wrote: > On 24 October 2012 22:47, Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> wrote: >> Hi koha-devel, >> >> The 3.10 and 3.12 QA teams ( Mason, Jonathan, Marcel & me, with the >> freshly elected Travis, Katrin -and Jared as RM-) have had a discussion >> about QA process and would like to propose the 2 following things: >> >> * Create a QA specific mailing list (q...@lists.koha-community.org ?) >> This list would be used for QA related discussions. We had some private >> discussions in the last months (mostly about koha-qa.pl tool = should we >> add this, remove that,...), and think it's better to have a public >> mailing list. [ One thing that worried us is "should we let anyone >> subscribe to the list or moderate list subscriptions to avoid non-QA >> threads". Not a big deal, but if you've an opinion... ] >> > Why can't we use the koha-devel list, and/or the bugs themselves .. > what type of mails would be on the qa list that wouldn't be fine on > the koha-devel list? > And if they are patch specific then on the bug itself makes more sense. >
> I'd definitely like to see any qa discussions public, but I don't see > the need for a new list .. am I missing something? yes Chris, you are missing a lot of boring chatter :) if people are OK with having the QA-team discuss their stuff on the koha-devel list, then i am happy (we could prefix the QA email's subject with 'QA: ', so people can ignore them easily, if they want too) are people OK with this? Mason _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
