Now that bug 8770 has been signed off, there are no blockers left,
however there is Bug 8252 which is marked critical.
It is to do with UNIMARC searching, so if a UNIMARC user could test it
that would be excellent.
Then there are just 4 major
9986
9575
9414
5366
That will leave just 21 bugs to ha
Paul wrote:
>At 12:15 AM 4/7/2013 +0200, Paul Poulain wrote:
>[snip]
>>The poll would have the following options :
>> * keep 3. "forever"
>> * keep the 3. until a major functional change is made, like
>introducing
>>a new search engine. The numbering change is decided by the Release
>Manager.
At 12:15 AM 4/7/2013 +0200, Paul Poulain wrote:
[snip]
The poll would have the following options :
* keep 3. "forever"
* keep the 3. until a major functional change is made, like introducing
a new search engine. The numbering change is decided by the Release Manager.
* drop the 3. and use 14.0
Paul,
OK, I propose to open a poll to have as many ppl opinion as possible.
> The most interested ppl being users/libraries themselves !
>
Are you seriously proposing we waste MORE time on this? As everyone
involved in this discussion has expressed a willingness to start versioning
Koha with whol
Le 05/04/2013 20:28, Galen Charlton a écrit :
> I don't ask much of version number schemes. Really just two things:
> first, that they increase from version to version. Second, that we
> don't spend a great deal of time discussing them. :)
OK, I propose to open a poll to have as many ppl opinion
At 03:37 PM 4/6/2013 +1300, Chris Cormack wrote:
Means we never need to worry about increasing the major number again, just
keep adding digits.
:)
Chris
Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Liz Rea wrote:
I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it afte
