Le 05/04/2013 20:28, Galen Charlton a écrit : > I don't ask much of version number schemes. Really just two things: > first, that they increase from version to version. Second, that we > don't spend a great deal of time discussing them. :) OK, I propose to open a poll to have as many ppl opinion as possible. The most interested ppl being users/libraries themselves !
The poll would have the following options : * keep 3. "forever" * keep the 3. until a major functional change is made, like introducing a new search engine. The numbering change is decided by the Release Manager. * drop the 3. and use 14.0, 14.1, 14.2, 16.0, 16.1,... * adopt a numbering style with YYYY-MM (2013-11, 2014-05, 2014-11,...) QUESTION TO THIS LIST, before the poll: for the YYY-MM style, how to number the maintaince releases ? 2 weeks for voting, same vote method as for KohaCon : option ranked #1=4 points, option ranked #2=3pts, #3=2pts, #4=1pt, you can rank how many options as you want. -- Paul POULAIN - Associé-gérant Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 http://www.biblibre.com Logiciels Libres pour les bibliothèques et les centres de documentation _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
