At 06:10 PM 12/13/2016 +0100, Mirko Tietgen wrote:
Hi.
it needs privacy information. What is anonymized, where and when?
Who has access to non-anonymised data (if anyone)?
I'm not a lawyer, but this might well fall foul of Canada's PIPEDA.
P.
It needs an imprint/statement of responsibility
Hi,
Chris Cormack schrieb am 13.12.2016
> I'm happy to volunteer to do all of those tasks.
Cool!
> CC-BY-SA is the license I would suggest, does anyone have objections? Adding
> a method to retrieve the data is easy.
Sounds good to me.
> And the rest I can write because I can see all the cod
I'm happy to volunteer to do all of those tasks.
CC-BY-SA is the license I would suggest, does anyone have objections? Adding a
method to retrieve the data is easy.
And the rest I can write because I can see all the code so can write up exactly
what is stored and how.
As to the why for the sy
Hi.
it needs privacy information. What is anonymized, where and when?
Who has access to non-anonymised data (if anyone)?
It needs an imprint/statement of responsibility on the website. Who
is responsible for gathering and processing the data, and for
anonymizing it? Where is the data stored?
It
Hi,
I'd really like to see Hea improved, and link to that instead. It is our
own, open, data. It is fully voluntary. We can make the registration
process easier for libraries - possibly as part of the installer. It is too
hidden now.
An API to Hea that I could pull from to use the data on the web
I agree, we could make the installer/upgrade prompt them to fill them in also.
And then it's just building an interface, if we can get JSON from Hea then that
part is easy. It then needs no work from users except to fill in the sysprefs.
Chris
On 14 December 2016 5:31:01 AM NZDT, Jonathan Drua
The easiest way in my opinion would be to improve Hea, we already have Koha
instances sending their data.
It is very easy for libraries to register as they just need to fill some
sysprefs in.
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 at 17:04 Nathan Curulla
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I hear what you are all saying abo
Exactly, we need to be front and centre in the Free and Open Source Software
world.
Hence we need open data, or we are going down the do as I say not as I do road.
Which is about the worst marketing any FOSS project can ever do.
Chris
On 14 December 2016 5:10:18 AM NZDT, Nathan Curulla
wrote
Hi Everyone,
I hear what you are all saying about this and agree that it would be better to
roll our own, but here is the thing: Hea is not user friendly at all and the
Wiki is not a good marketing tool because it is not pretty (no offense on
either of these). If you really want to market Koha
Hi Everyone,
I hear what you are all saying about this and agree that it would be better to
roll our own, but here is the thing: Hea is not user friendly at all and the
Wiki is not a good marketing tool because it is not pretty (no offense on
either of these). If you really want to market Koha
http://hea.koha-community.org/libraries This is the list I am referring
to. There is an option to send your library name as part of Hea
registration.
Cheers,
Liz
On 13/12/16 12:37, Marc Véron wrote:
> +1
>
> Marc
>
>
> Am 12.12.2016 um 23:15 schrieb Liz Rea:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd really like to see He
+1
Marc
Am 12.12.2016 um 23:15 schrieb Liz Rea:
Hi,
I'd really like to see Hea improved, and link to that instead. It is our
own, open, data. It is fully voluntary. We can make the registration
process easier for libraries - possibly as part of the installer. It is too
hidden now.
An API to
12 matches
Mail list logo
