I agree that it is not good to encourage using of it yet. The bare
minimum of functionality is the undo/redo. Or at least backing up the
project somehow before.
On 2017-01-10 16:54, Chris Pavlina wrote:
What do you do when the internal APIs change and the plugins stop
working?
I think encour
I was the one suggesting that, and I would also suggest that every extra
component/footprint that does not have the "virtual" attribute should be
removed if there is not a matching schematic symbol, so that an extra
resistor would be removed, but an extra mounting hole with the virtual
tag woul
Hello!
I hacked together a group selection concept looking like this:
https://youtu.be/eJp-aJ8i0H4
It can assign BOARD_ITEM to a specific group for easier selection and
group manipulation. I am open to suggestions on changes, this is surely
not an optimal implementation.
Useful when you may
Attaching Patch!
( Thanks Chris! )
On 2017-01-11 20:51, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello!
I hacked together a group selection concept looking like this:
https://youtu.be/eJp-aJ8i0H4
It can assign BOARD_ITEM to a specific group for easier selection and
group manipulation. I am open to
Hey again, What would be the chances of seing this getting into the
master branches on launchpad, what would I have to add/change to get it
there?
- Kristoffer
On 2017-01-11 21:59, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Attaching Patch!
( Thanks Chris! )
On 2017-01-11 20:51, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
>
> Original message
> From: Kristoffer Ödmark mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>>
> Date: 12/01/2017 12:41 (GMT+01:00)
> To: kicad-developers
groups) would be also an advantage.
Cheers,
Tom
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
---- Original message
From: Kristoffer Ödmark
Date: 12/01/2017 12:41 (GMT+01:00)
To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Group selection idea
Hey again, What
ew for the time being and not get bogged
down in a full implementation specification.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 1/12/2017 3:38 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I think Physical design reuse (PDR) is far out of scope of the group
selection idea. However it Might be used. I actually put some thinking
on howto
impler with the new
> connectivity algorithm, but a possible way is:
> * Iterate through all components pads in the source room
> * Find the attached tracks and see if they lead to another component in
> the same room. If it is true, the track should be copied.
> * Propagate nets from
t is recreating the tracks/vias. To do so, one needs to
>> find all the room internal tracks and copy them to the destination room,
>> updating the nets. Perhaps that will be simpler with the new
>> connectivity algorithm, but a possible way is:
>> * Iterate through all comp
esign specification, I think it's a
>> bit premature and will distract us from the immediate work at hand.
>> None of the schematic group linking work can happen until the new
>> schematic and symbol library file formats are complete. I want to keep
>> the focus on
Hello again from 2017.
Did any decisions arrive from this work that werent made public? I would
sure like to see this added.
- Kristoffer
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
U
For basic work, maybe reusing zones functionality in the footprint editor
will be enough, and then the anchors would be added by regular circular or
rectangular pads. Similar to how one would add custom paste layers today.
For more advanced, I vote svg or gerber import.
SVG is a common file form
pe editor is already available).
That seems like a good plan, to get a sense of the demand for the editor etc.
- Kristoffer
On 01/16/2017 04:30 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 16/01/2017 à 14:18, Kristoffer Ödmark a écrit :
>> For basic work, maybe reusing zones functionality in the f
Hello! good initiative checking for use cases!
I use ratsnest initially to populate the board, checking where everything goes
etc.
I would like to be able to hide nets like GND and 3V3 since I most often do 4
layers desgin with each of these as an entire plane.
Then to be able to select a gro
I looked at the video and the concept is very nice, nice work!
I agree with wayne that automatic netcode is a bit dangerous, I would
recommend that you use a wxSingleChoice dialog in the beginning of
adding a via, so that the user can choose netcode from a list. Or
something better :)
> I woul
> - Add a shortcut to group/ungroup (e.g. Ctrl+G/Ctrl+U).
> - Add a 'merge groups' option which squashes several groups into a -
> single one.
Will look into it, although I see these as additions to a feature not yet
On 01/19/2017 02:30 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> On 1
Hello!
One thing that has always bothered me is that when aligning 3D models to
fit the footprint, one have to type the value and test, delete
characters and test again. Very minor issue, but it still bothers me.
With a spinbox the values can be changed using the mouse only.
attaching the pa
Hello!
One thing that has always bothered me is that when aligning 3D models to
fit the footprint, one have to type the value and test, delete
characters and test again. Very minor issue, but it still bothers me.
With a spinbox the values can be changed using the mouse only.
attaching the pa
it until it's
aligned. If the model is far off it can be hard to guess what the offset
should be like, so having a button to nudge it up and down could be nice.
Might want to hold off for a bit though as I think there was talk about
an updated patch in IRC, this might not be final
On 1/26/2
on something other than Linux yet? I'd like to see this
merged.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 05:24:17PM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Yes, you can still manually change the values, I tried that.
The only change I did to the code was to change the stepping of the offset
to 0.1mm instead of 1
ontrol does not
update 3D view of the model. This issue will need to be resolved before
the patch can be committed.
On 1/27/2017 8:16 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Glad to hear it!
Also, I found that incrementing in steps of 10 for the rotations misses
45 deegrees, so changed that to 5 and made
2017-01-30 09:42, Nick Østergaard wrote:
Please show me your cmake options. Remember to make sure you have the
relevant mingw toolchain installed.
2017-01-30 9:23 GMT+01:00 Kristoffer Ödmark :
I can't get Kicad to compile under windows, the guide in the online docs
doesnt work for me under wi
pacman -S make
2017-01-30 10:51 GMT+02:00 Kristoffer Ödmark
mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>>:
I am using this PKGbuild:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-kicad-git/PKGBUILD
<https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/blob/master
This issue will need to be resolved before
the patch can be committed.
On 1/27/2017 8:16 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Glad to hear it!
Also, I found that incrementing in steps of 10 for the rotations misses
45 deegrees, so changed that to 5 and made it wrap around at 180 as well.
Attaching tha
e changes update
> instantly. With your patch, you have to tab to the next control before
> the change is made. IMO, this is a step backwards from the current
> behavior at least on windows. I'm not sure I'm good with this
> regression. Anyone else have any thoughts on this.
>
Yeah I was actually looking into doing something like this. It actually
seems easier than getting the spinctrl do to what I want on multiple
platforms.
I agree that on windows, the patch is an regression if it doesnt update
the view instantly.
-Kristoffer
On 2017-01-31 10:01, Mário Luzeiro
The real motivation for doing this was the functionality of the
scrollwheel. Which I got for free in the spinctrldouble, only in linux
though.
But since the implementation of spinctrls was horrible on other os, I
stuck with the textctrl and instead catch the mouse events and also the
keyevent
ent
sizes could be a bit smaller. Perhaps 5° for angles and 0.02"
for offsets.
On 1/31/2017 8:03 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> The real motivation for doing this was the functionality of the
> scrollwheel. Which I got for free in the spinctrld
I was also using cairo if that makes a difference
- Kristoffer
On 02/01/2017 02:32 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I was using windows 7 when I tested this. I will check my windows 10
box at home when I get a chance.
On 2/1/2017 8:02 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Can someone else confirm this? In
Just going to chip in and say that I agree here, having had students
working with kicad, Its really not obvious what application to use for
what. The cvpcb is unpronouncable in any regard and even harder to
remember. One of the most common questions actually.
- Kristoffer
On 2017-02-02 20:28,
Why dont keep it dead simple, but still keeping the KiCAD brand?
I suggest prefix every subprogram with kicad- and then use a either
extremely well known abbreviation (PCB) or a descriptive english word.
Examples:
eeschema-> kicad-schematics
pcbnew -> kicad-layouts
3d-viewer -> kic
I would really like to see this!
Ideally I would like to be able to see it by just selecting a part in
eeschema, a bit like the sidebar in inkscape/gimp or other editing
softwares shows information about an object.
Link to screenshot of the inkscape sidebar I am talking about:
https://thorwil
-02-03 17:33 GMT+01:00 Heikki Pulkkinen :
Hello Kristoffer,
I just made a new patch, with some modifications. I changed that GAL canvas
adding algorithm, so that it does not involve PNS any longer.
Cheers
Heikki
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
wrote:
Hello!
I wanted t
Hello!
I found an interesting and well written offtopic comment[1] in the user
forum regarding the different pickers, and I went to investigate in the
code.
I was looking for the dialog for the footprint browser, but I did not
find it. What I found however was that it was not implemented in
This seems dangerous, I have seen a few design where there are 5-10 pins
hidden under the same pin, excpecting them to be connected.
I would rather this hidden connections were indicated in some way, this
change disconnects lines and might break some users footprints-symbols
connection.
- Kr
currently have a few symbols that do that
too).
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This seems dangerous, I have seen a few design where there are 5-10
pins hidden under the same pin, excpecting them to be connected.
s
that you can't see should make connections that you can't see to wires
that you can? The ONLY imaginable use case for this is stacks of pins.
Every other possible case is a mistake.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:09:44AM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Honestly I think the invisible pins
ning if it is connectable is the right way,
rather have a pop-up warning that says that you have connected to an
invisible pin.
- Kristoffer
On 2017-02-07 12:50, Chris Pavlina wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:44:45PM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I wasnt saying its a good idea, but having
toffer
On 2017-02-07 13:22, Chris Pavlina wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:15:43PM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I think the aim then should be to inform about this. I see the "invisible"
checkbox as being just that, it makes the pins invisible, but still
connected.
Shouldnt this be
n pin in it. They just wonder
why ERC is complaining about a connection somewhere where there is no
pin (that they can see).
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:46:17PM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I think having a pins function changing depending on its relative position
to other pins is more conf
>> Invisible pin support has to be maintained. I'm guessing some users
>> still prefer it and there are legacy designs which cannot be broken.
Couldn't invisible pins become visible? As a transition make them grey
or something?
Just changing how they are displayed would not break any designs.
I am curious too.
- Kristoffer
On 2017-02-07 22:06, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
Could you please elaborate on the specific problem with handling events?
I prefer to learn what the problem was rather than to use another tool
because it gives the desired results and without understanding why.
- Ciril
And the option to stick to an older version of kicad with the legacy
support is always there...
On 2017-02-08 12:35, Chris Pavlina wrote:
Something stands out from this email that's worth mentioning, I think:
Admitted, I don't have the newest hardware but I like to have not so fast
machines i
I am seeing the "Pads" menu entry when right-clicking empty in linux,
"push pads settings" is enabled in the submenus and if I press that one
and get a small dialog, the button "Pad Editor" gives me a segfault. I
am guessing that is because there is no footprint selected.
- Kristoffer
On 2017
Hello again!
Since my groupselection required changes to the file format to be
useful. I have now created a selection tool that selects all footprints
belonging on the same sheet or "deeper".
It also finds all nets that only have connections between components on
the same or deeper sheet and
I tried reverting back to master and found the same strange bugs on
windows, so i do not think my patch causes them.
example of bug:
https://snag.gy/EesP2n.jpg
On 2017-02-08 19:17, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello again!
Since my groupselection required changes to the file format to be
useful
I can only speak from own experience since I was assisting in an
electronics course at Luleå Technical University (LTU), Sweden. We were
doing the switch from Eagle to KiCad during this time. Many professors
still guide people to Eagle, however with the new change I believe and
hope Kicad will
I have never used it and I find the menu in legacy a bit to cluttered.
an alternative might be that when duplicating a layer (Ctrl+D), It would
get duplicated to the chosen layer in the right hand layer menu, as with
tracks.
-Kristoffer
On 2017-02-09 17:10, Marcos Chaparro wrote:
Just as si
Updated the patch to fit on current master.
On 2017-02-08 21:14, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I tried reverting back to master and found the same strange bugs on
windows, so i do not think my patch causes them.
example of bug:
https://snag.gy/EesP2n.jpg
On 2017-02-08 19:17, Kristoffer Ödmark
Sure! here comes!
- Kristoffer
On 2017-02-11 03:02, Chris Pavlina wrote:
Can you update this again?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:45:10PM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Updated the patch to fit on current master.
On 2017-02-08 21:14, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I tried reverting back to master
Hmm, I am a fan of the selection menu that pops up actually, I would
like to keep it.
I think that the list can be used simultaneous with the hotkeys and
autoselection. Just hide it whenever another action is invoked on the
item that is curently selected in the list.
- Kristoffer
On 2017-02
I actually like this idea and can relate to the problem. Basically
having "optional" pins, still retaining the alternate pin function though.
These are some hefty changes to the current implementation, but having
the .sweet file system consider this might be an idea, so that this may
be implem
Hello JP!
Might I suggest that the increment value for the rotation of the
component is increased a bit, I have yet to find a component that has
needed to be rotated to something else than +-90 or 180 degrees.
I might suggest increments of 15degree, rotating 180 degrees is a bit
much with 1
Hello again.
I also noticed you put the limit for scale to 100, this actually breaks
a few of my 3d models I have downloaded from 3dcontentcentral.
They sometimes need a scaling factor of 400 or 500.
Also, I retract my previous comment about scaling factor, 0.02 is fine
for these insane numb
Pavlina wrote:
Merged. This looks very useful. Thank you for your contribution!
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 01:25:24PM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Sure! here comes!
- Kristoffer
On 2017-02-11 03:02, Chris Pavlina wrote:
Can you update this again?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:45:10PM +0100
Found some coding style errors that were fixed in this.
And in accordance with previous patches/features ive sent a youtube vid
is now attached.
https://youtu.be/fISB7S5YFvo
- Kristoffer
On 2017-03-03 00:52, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello
These two patches adds crossprobing to the
, Chris Pavlina mailto:pavlina.ch...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Nice! Looks good, and works perfectly here. Merged, thank you :)
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:14:33AM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> Found some coding style errors that were fixed in this.
>
> And in accordanc
What os are you running? When you test it also give give me compilation
options etc so that I can see what it might be.
- Kristoffer
On 2017-03-03 15:23, firewalker wrote:
I will try an older version (before your patch) to check it.
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
Hello all!
I just wanted to highlight an emerging problem to catch it in its cradle.
The new tool and dialog patches that has been merged are great. But they
also introduce secret functionaly, examples:
Ctrl + click: highlights net ( modifier to select tool )
ctrl + drag:snap angles in
a
one-liner. We do have a little area of the status bar that tells you
what tool you're in, but that's nowhere near big enough to naively
plonk screeds of text.
tl;dr agree but no ideas yet!
Cheers,
John
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
wrote:
Hello all!
I just
the bottom of the screen, for example a quick mockup:
http://i.imgur.com/wB0Yecy.png
Then we would just need to define up to N hotkeys for each tool / tool
mode that should be hinted to the user. (Where N is some number that
looks not too cramped)
-Jon
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Kristoffer Öd
ar 15, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark
mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Jon,
I do not think that the hotkeys are a problem. The right-click menu
shows how they are bound already and the right click menu is
adaptable. I personally like the way that
what
will happen when you do various things with it held down
Maybe once I have some more things done off my to-do list I will spend
some more time making a mockup of this.
Best,
Jon
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark
mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes,
Just wanted to point out that if there shall be flipping about arbitrary
axises, some kind of indication of how the board is currently flipped
would be nice.
Maybe axis indication or whatever.
- Kristoffer
On 03/30/2017 02:43 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Cirilo Be
I agree here as well, I dont think that informing users of changes that
will happen /once/ is to be considered nagware, and is a lot prefered
than to just do the changes and let the user figure it out afterwards.
On 2017-03-31 16:02, José Ignacio wrote:
I do not thing such option is necessary,
wrote:
Le 11/01/2017 à 14:55, Kristoffer Ödmark a écrit :
I was the one suggesting that, and I would also suggest that every
extra component/footprint that
does not have the "virtual" attribute should be removed if there is
not a matching schematic symbol,
so that an extra resistor would be
Hello everyone!
I made a small change to the "select hierarchical sheet" function. I
would love if someone tried this and gave some feedback.
Before the function only selected segments belonging to a netlist unique
to that hierarchical sheet. Now it will use the "select logical
connection" t
Hello all!
Last night I was doing some design that used a PCB antenna. I had this
antenna design made in zones, It was very frustrating to try to copy
this between an old design and a new one since I had to use a texteditor
( very glad that I could though ).
After this I figured that this sh
Hello!
I like the functionality a lot! Selection is probably the one thing that
is used most of all functions in kicad, so I clearly like that it can be
done in multiple ways! I do however wonder how one would find and
discover this functionality?
- Kristoffer
On 05/02/2017 09:25 AM, Oliver
not sure but it
might be a common pattern in other programs as well. Maybe a helpful
tooltip-text on the selection tool would be enough?
//Konrad
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
wrote:
Hello!
I like the functionality a lot! Selection is probably the one thing that is
u
pp,h} too.
Regards,
Orson
On 05/04/2017 10:40 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello all!
Last night I was doing some design that used a PCB antenna. I had this
antenna design made in zones, It was very frustrating to try to copy
this between an old design and a new one since I had to use a texteditor
(
Hey!
This might be the one of the best new features with kicad in my opninion!
It would be more intuitive to have a bom-generator inside this tool as
well. A wsiwyg BOM-generator if you will. Just to generate a .csv or a
rahter a .tsv as the default. Leaving the current way to plugin-generate
49AM +0200, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Just to generate a .csv or a rahter a .tsv as the default.
May I suggest a .?sv
where the ? character is a "user defined character" that defaults to ...
comma (or tab or what you want) Separated Values list?
TIA
--
Marco Ciampa
I know a joke about UD
05/2017 13.17 skrev "Kristoffer Ödmark"
mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>>:
Doesnt really matter what delimiter is used.
It would just feel better if kicad had a default BOM-generation
built in. Then I dont mind if someone prefers the alternative
scritpting way t
Well I think these reasons are strange, I think that having a built in
way of exporting the BoM from the software is reasonable. Since not
everyone are the same.
The component table is what a user expects to see when wanting to
generate a BOM. I can assure you that no EE or student expects to
Regards,
Orson
On 05/04/2017 10:40 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello all!
Last night I was doing some design that used a PCB antenna. I had this
antenna design made in zones, It was very frustrating to try to copy
this between an old design and a new one since I had to use a texteditor
( very gl
ng-format
will do most of the boring work for you.
If we decide to choose your way, then you need to add GPL license header
for kicad_clipboard.{cpp,h} too.
Regards,
Orson
On 05/04/2017 10:40 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello all!
Last night I was doing some design that used a PCB antenna. I
Hello!
Is there any interest in this?
- Kristoffer
On 2017-05-21 22:32, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello!
I fixed the kicad clipboard code according to your comments, it is now
linked to ctrl+c and ctrl+v, utilizing different code paths depending on
what frame they are invoked at.
I also
Is there anything that some can help you with here, and in that case,
what would that be?
- Kristoffer
On 2017-06-01 02:38, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I apologize for not replying sooner but I've been really swamped at work
and summer isn't the best time of the year for me to get work done. I'm
s
Hello again!
I understand that everyone is pretty busy, but I would appreciate if
someone took a quick glance at this and said what they think.
- Kristoffer
On 2017-05-03 15:51, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello everyone!
I made a small change to the "select hierarchical sheet" f
Hi!
I will bump this issue again, but to avoid bikesheeding I will ask for a
decision from leader Wayne. Should there be a default field in kicad for
part number and if, what should it be named?
From what i gather, a field for a part number is the only thing
everyone agrees on, after that ev
:
Are the KiCad library developers planning on providing atomic symbol
libraries? I'm guessing that is the end goal for reserving a name for
an optional field. I cannot think of any other reason to do this.
On 6/6/2017 9:22 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> H
to satisfy them all with one field defined on KiCad side?
I guess someone who wants to setup a serious BOM workflow should be able to
configure field names on both sides to match…
Just my 2 cents…
Regards,
Bernhard
On 6. Jun 2017, at 18:51, Kristoffer Ödmark
wrote:
The main reason for
hello!
I noticed that exception specifiers is deprecated in c++11, and since
they are in the coding policy of kicad, naturally they are everywhere in
the kicad source.
I attached a patch where i removed all of them just to show how many of
them there are, also suggest that we remove that fro
02:18, Chris Pavlina wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:03:29AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On 08.06.2017 23:56, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
I attached a patch where i removed all of them just to show how many of
them there are, also suggest that we remove that from the coding policy
( patch 2
Hello!
I have been using the nightly version of kicad for a while. But recently
the 3d-viewer stopped displaying models on my board. First I thought
that it was my GPU being strange ( AMD R390x ). But now it has happened
on my Manjaro laptop as well with integrated Intel gpu.
Is anyone else
x27;t have a chance at moment to test the current main branch,
but I assure you it is not a GPU or driver problem! ;)
Mario
____
From: Kicad-developers
on behalf of Kristoffer Ödmark
Sent: 30 June 2017 09:21:00
To: KiCad Developers
Subject: [Kicad-developers
I am currently doing just that, takes a while though, really wish I had
a faster pc for this.
On 2017-07-02 21:54, Clemens Koller wrote:
Hi!
Do you see any chance to use git-bisect to find the patch triggering your
problem?
Regards,
Clemens
On 2017-07-02 18:46, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote
Ödmark wrote:
I am currently doing just that, takes a while though, really wish I had
a faster pc for this.
On 2017-07-02 21:54, Clemens Koller wrote:
Hi!
Do you see any chance to use git-bisect to find the patch triggering
your problem?
Regards,
Clemens
On 2017-07-02 18:46, Kristoffer
Well nevermind, Nickoe suggested I nuke my build dir and restart, and
this worked. So time well wasted on my side :)
- Kristoffer
On 2017-07-02 22:35, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Found the problem.
commit 68a7a5235e3d8de2d4381b42a63d3bf6e3ee8e30
Author: Cirilo Bernardo
Date: Mon Apr 17 01:41
Good ideas! I would also like a better SCM behavior. Having the file
change as little as possible would be great for those things.
I will this and see what else you encounter :)
On 2017-07-01 04:49, hauptmech wrote:
We have a fairly complex board that needs to be done yesterday. We've
been e
Hey Tom!
Any ETA for the new Via tool dialog? It's some solid work you have done,
thanks!
- Kristoffer
On 2017-06-27 21:54, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
On 27.06.2017 21:24, Simon Küppers wrote:
Small Bump.
Can anyone shed some light on the new Via Tool? Is it supposed to be not
ready yet? The
Hey!
I made the copy/paste/cut functionality work as someone new to the
software might expect. That is, the cut command now actually puts the
block in clipboard and then deletes the block, compared to just deleting
it (wtf)?
They are also bound to the almost universal defaults of ctrl+c/v/x.
se cursor out of the schematic frame to click the
toolbar buttons.
- Add Paste operation in the right-click context menu when clipboard is
not empty.
Regards,
Orson
On 07/03/2017 01:51 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hey!
I made the copy/paste/cut functionality work as someone new to the
software mi
Yes, in this patch, the patch for pcbnew is still pending in the pcbnew
clipboard support email since the 4th of may :)
On 2017-07-03 17:40, firewalker wrote:
Only for Eeschema?
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
mailto:kristofferodmar...@gmail.com>>
Could we not support reading both formats, but only write one format?
- Kristoffer
On 2017-07-10 09:36, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
I think there is a lot of code that assumes consecutive net numbering.
Instead, we could simply save net names instead of net numbers and let
KiCad use net codes as con
Hello!
Second bump, I guess I might be the only one who uses the
sheet-selection then :) My suggestion is to merge this patch in, It
makes the selection more much more useful!
- Kristoffer
On 2017-06-06 13:44, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello again!
I understand that everyone is pretty busy
,
Wayne
On 7/10/2017 11:21 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello!
Second bump, I guess I might be the only one who uses the
sheet-selection then :) My suggestion is to merge this patch in, It
makes the selection more much more useful!
- Kristoffer
On 2017-06-06 13:44, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Hello
. I can create a bug report if necessary.
Regards,
Orson
On 07/11/2017 05:36 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Well, the sheet-selection code was all submitted by me in the first
place, It doesnt exist in legacy, so this change to how it works is
according to me more inline with what I wan
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
