I have created KiPadCheck as a post-layout DRC addition to KiCad. It has some
checks related to pads, vias, drill, silkscreen, paste, and mask that address
some shortcomings in KiCad DRC. I have also researched Eagle's DRC and they
allow a fairly wide range of specifications for layers, vias and
Reminder.
Regards
Fabrizio
On Aug 17, 2017 4:42 PM, "Fabrizio Tappero"
wrote:
> Hello,
> the following patch does the following:
> 1) correct few pcbnew and eeschema menu text entries
> 2) add the library table icon (minor look change)
> 3) delete the redundant word "Run" into the KiCad - Tool
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I'm not opposed to this change. However, there are two schools of
> thought when it comes to board layout: strict layout constraints and no
> layout constraints. I tend to lean towards the latter but I've been
> doing this for 30 years so
Rather than add a wxComboBox to the WX_UNIT_BINDER object, wouldn't be
be cleaner to change wxTextCtrl* to wxTextEntry* which wxComboBox and
wxTextCtrl (along with several others) are derived from?
On 8/21/2017 4:09 PM, Mathias Grimmberger wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think it would be nice if the t
On 8/22/2017 8:05 AM, Bastian Neumannn wrote:
> Hi
>
>> Ultimately is it useful to design a board, if you cannot make it?
>
> Right now I can fabricate boards, I can not design. That is also not a
> good solution.
>
> via constraints are tricky bussiness as they are very specific to the
> manufa
That's awesome, jp!
I am able to test the nightly version of Windows, so let me know (perhaps via
the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1712233) when you'd like me
to test. I am currently unable to rebuild KiCad, so I rely on the nightly
builds to test.
On Tuesday, August 22,
Le 22/08/2017 à 19:33, Greg Smith a écrit :
> Continuing to review, it appears I am wrong. PCB_EDIT_FRAME:sLV does in fact
> synchronize the
> checkboxes, but also calls PCB_DRAW_PANEL_GAL::SLV to do the background
> synchronization of the layers.
>
> Thank you jp, and I apologize for not resear
Continuing to review, it appears I am wrong. PCB_EDIT_FRAME:sLV does in fact
synchronize the checkboxes, but also calls PCB_DRAW_PANEL_GAL::SLV to do the
background synchronization of the layers.
Thank you jp, and I apologize for not researching sufficiently your answer
before posting.
So at thi
Thank you jp!
This appears to not actually be true and reveals (I think) an inconsistency in
the KiCad code.
PCB_DRAW_PANEL_GAL::SyncLayersVisibility
is VERY different from
PCB_EDIT_FRAME::syncLayerVisibilities
PCB_DRAW_PANEL_GAL::SLV modifies the visibility of the layers themselves,
taking care
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 3:10 AM, Simon Küppers wrote:
>
> I second this. Working in a Research Institute I can assure you, that very
> often there are circuit boards with "interesting" stackups and via
> configurations... These boards are not produced by quick-turn factories like
> eurocircuits
Le 22/08/2017 à 14:42, Greg Smith a écrit :
>
> How do I call PCB_DRAW_PANEL_GAL::SyncLayersVisibility from python? I can't
> find where it exists in
> the python hierarchy.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1712233
>
> I believe it's the solution to fixing a bug that prevents LayerViewSet
Hi!
Maybe, some of these HDI Design Guides + documents are useful:
http://www.we-online.com/web/de/index.php/download/media/04_leiterplatte/2011_2/relaunch/produkte_5/microvia_hdi/141030_DesignGuide_HDI_1_1.pdf
Page 8 gives quite a good overview of what's possible - at least!
http://www.ilfa.de/
Yes, I'm referring to the schematic wires. Through the G hotkey has the
functionality, the wires are not orthogonal bend at 90 degrees) after
drag/move.
I don't think it would be lot of logic to add. Because we can use any
existing routing library such as A* search algorithm.
1) Call the routin
Try 'G' to grab rather than 'M' to move
is that what you mean?
On 08/22/2017 09:04 AM, Arun Kumar wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> The wire connections doesn't move or sustain when the parts are moved
> around. Is there any work going on to address this. Almost in all
> commercial softwares the wires conne
I'm assuming you're referring to schematic wires? I'm not sure if there is
active work going on in this area, but I briefly looked into adding this
functionality and decided it would be better to wait until eeschema is
using GAL canvas and the new tools system instead of spending time adding
lots o
Hi Team,
The wire connections doesn't move or sustain when the parts are moved
around. Is there any work going on to address this. Almost in all
commercial softwares the wires connections adjust as per the movement of
the parts.
Thanks,
Arun
___
Mailing
Sorry about the delay but I was dealing with a family emergency all last
week. Now that I'm getting caught up I really need to get stable
version 4.0.7 released. Are there any outstanding issue remaining
before I make the release announcement? I'm shooting for Friday or
Saturday.
On 8/17/2017 8
How do I call PCB_DRAW_PANEL_GAL::SyncLayersVisibility from python? I can't
find where it exists in the python hierarchy.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1712233
I believe it's the solution to fixing a bug that prevents LayerViewSet.py from
working well.https://github.com/HiGregSmith/Laye
Hi
> Ultimately is it useful to design a board, if you cannot make it?
Right now I can fabricate boards, I can not design. That is also not a good
solution.
via constraints are tricky bussiness as they are very specific to the
manufacturer.
> PS:
> The current "tracks and vias editor" dialog is
Le 22/08/2017 à 12:10, Simon Küppers a écrit :
> I second this. Working in a Research Institute I can assure you, that very
> often there are circuit
> boards with "interesting" stackups and via configurations... These boards are
> not produced by
> quick-turn factories like eurocircuits but comp
I second this. Working in a Research Institute I can assure you, that
very often there are circuit boards with "interesting" stackups and via
configurations... These boards are not produced by quick-turn factories
like eurocircuits but companies such as ILFA or Optiprint.
It would be unwise to
it is hard to move and roll pcb board in 3d-viewer. why not design the control
as same as a game. that is a very intuitive and natural way to control the
object in a game.___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-deve
On 22/08/17 18:25, jp charras wrote:
Le 22/08/2017 à 05:55, hauptmech a écrit :
Manufacturing techniques vary between manufacturers and continuously evolve.
Why would kicad limit
itself to what eurocircuits can do? They have optimized their process for quick
turn prototyping and
while they do
23 matches
Mail list logo