Le 02/02/2011 00:15, Marco Mattila a écrit :
Now there should be a little something for everyone in the latest
revision. It was possible to make the plot dialog a little smaller by
getting rid of the radio buttons and moving the output directory field
(although I'm not sure it's in the right plac
Le 01/02/2011 22:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
While trekking though the Kicad source to removed the old zooming code, I
discovered another issue that is going to drive me insane (it's a short drive)
until it gets fixed. Currently, there are two cursor positions stored in
Kicad. One is the oper
Dick,
Can you explain "The resizing capability" a little bit, what to resize?
Tony
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More he
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> The decision was made not to use XML due to human readability issues. A
> project is currently in progress to use an S-expression based design for
> this reason. S-expressions look a bit like the LISP programming
> language. Search the m
On 02/01/2011 08:30 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 04:53 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 2/1/2011 5:02 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
Does anyone know of any reason this can't be done. If it works properly,
it
should greatly simplify the drawing code. If no one objects, I
On 02/01/2011 04:53 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 5:02 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>> Does anyone know of any reason this can't be done. If it works properly, it
>>> should greatly simplify the drawing code. If no one objects, I would like
>>> to
>>> tackle this before resuming my EES
On 2/1/2011 6:41 PM, Nils Hesse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to ask if there's a particular reason why KiCAD uses its own
> file formats. Why KiCAD doesn't simply use for example XML?
Nils,
The decision was made not to use XML due to human readability issues. A
project is currently in progress to
On 2/1/2011 5:58 PM, Mike Goodfellow wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 17:53 -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 2/1/2011 5:02 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> >
>> >> Does anyone know of any reason this can't be done. If it works properly,
>> >> it
>> >> should greatly simplify the drawing code. If
On 2/1/2011 6:15 PM, Marco Mattila wrote:
> Now there should be a little something for everyone in the latest
> revision. It was possible to make the plot dialog a little smaller by
> getting rid of the radio buttons and moving the output directory field
> (although I'm not sure it's in the right p
Hi,
I wanted to ask if there's a particular reason why KiCAD uses its own
file formats. Why KiCAD doesn't simply use for example XML?
Also I wanted to ask if there's any plan to add support for using
white spaces in the name of schematic symbols or footprints.
I think the problem of not supporti
Now there should be a little something for everyone in the latest
revision. It was possible to make the plot dialog a little smaller by
getting rid of the radio buttons and moving the output directory field
(although I'm not sure it's in the right place now...). I also agree
that the dialog is a bi
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 17:53 -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 5:02 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know of any reason this can't be done. If it works properly,
> >> it
> >> should greatly simplify the drawing code. If no one objects, I would like
> >> to
> >> tackle
On 2/1/2011 5:02 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know of any reason this can't be done. If it works properly, it
>> should greatly simplify the drawing code. If no one objects, I would like to
>> tackle this before resuming my EESchema refactoring work.
>
> I don't know enough about
> Simon> Thank you for taking the time to read it in the first place. I
> suspect that we are not too different in our thinking it's probably that
> email isn't an easy medium convey ideas in either direction.Sorry if we
> are going over old ground.
Simon,
If you intend to write a server and
> Does anyone know of any reason this can't be done. If it works properly, it
> should greatly simplify the drawing code. If no one objects, I would like to
> tackle this before resuming my EESchema refactoring work.
I don't know enough about it to object.
On a related note, I have been thinki
While trekking though the Kicad source to removed the old zooming code, I
discovered another issue that is going to drive me insane (it's a short drive)
until it gets fixed. Currently, there are two cursor positions stored in
Kicad. One is the operating system cursor position and the other is the
Hi - please see below
On 01/02/2011 19:40, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 02/01/2011 01:14 PM, Mike Goodfellow wrote:
Dick, Wayne& Jean-Pierre,
A week ago Simon Rogers posted on the developers mailing list regarding
some ideas with the Kicad library. A "we" was mentioned in the post, well,
the "we
Marco,
Now please realize that you have to make EVERYONE happy, even if they
disagree among themselves. :)
And no good deed goes unpunished. And the pay is low.
And coder decides. Because the pay is low.
Dick
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad
On 02/01/2011 01:40 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 01:14 PM, Mike Goodfellow wrote:
>> Dick, Wayne & Jean-Pierre,
>>
>> A week ago Simon Rogers posted on the developers mailing list regarding
>> some ideas with the Kicad library. A "we" was mentioned in the post, well,
>> the "we" is ma
On 02/01/2011 02:03 PM, Simon Rogers wrote:
> My initial response is that it would require all library providers to
> run a bzr server which would be a bit more heavyweight than a dedicated
> lib server. This may or may not be a problem.
>
Probably the easiest path to a high end part server is
No - that's good question. We are still feeling our way around the
source as well.
My initial response is that it would require all library providers to
run a bzr server which would be a bit more heavyweight than a dedicated
lib server. This may or may not be a problem.
Regards,
Simon
On 01
On 2/1/11 7:43 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
Le 01/02/2011 19:20, Jerry Jacobs a écrit :
Hello Marco,
I like it but it has still some issues with wxWidgets on Mac with
version 2.9.2 from svn (rev 66766).
I committed a fix, with a minor enhancement. This issue could be a
wxFormBuilder issue
Marco,
I've been following this thread and have a few suggestions for the plot dialog.
1) Hide the irrelevant settings depending on the current plot type selected.
In other words, hide the postscript and HPGL options when plotting gerbers.
2) Use a wxChoice to select the plot type instead of rad
On 02/01/2011 01:14 PM, Mike Goodfellow wrote:
> Dick, Wayne & Jean-Pierre,
>
> A week ago Simon Rogers posted on the developers mailing list regarding
> some ideas with the Kicad library. A "we" was mentioned in the post, well,
> the "we" is made up of Simon and I - we both work together at the sa
I'm sorry if this question seems dumb, I'm still getting my feet wet
with Kicad and its source..
but reading your document, isn't this already achievable by putting
your library under a versioning tool, like bzr, on a centralized server?
FV
On 02/01/2011 08:14 PM, Mike Goodfellow wrote:
> Dick,
Mmm.. sounds quite complex.. maybe it's better to start from something
else.. I'll give it a look anyway.
Thanks,
FV
On 02/01/2011 08:12 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 12:43 PM, Fabio Varesano wrote:
>> Thank you Dick, it seems that the problem has gone away with 2779.
>>
>> Would yo
Dick, Wayne & Jean-Pierre,
A week ago Simon Rogers posted on the developers mailing list regarding
some ideas with the Kicad library. A "we" was mentioned in the post,
well, the "we" is made up of Simon and I - we both work together at the
same company and have used Kicad for a while now.
Anyway,
On 02/01/2011 12:43 PM, Fabio Varesano wrote:
> Thank you Dick, it seems that the problem has gone away with 2779.
>
> Would you mind in which commit you fixed this? I'm getting started
> with Kicad sources and it would help me as I briefly tried to fix that
> problem by myself.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fab
Le 01/02/2011 19:20, Jerry Jacobs a écrit :
Hello Marco,
I like it but it has still some issues with wxWidgets on Mac with version 2.9.2
from svn (rev 66766).
I committed a fix, with a minor enhancement. This issue could be a
wxFormBuilder issue,
or could be due to some changes between wxW
Thank you Dick, it seems that the problem has gone away with 2779.
Would you mind in which commit you fixed this? I'm getting started
with Kicad sources and it would help me as I briefly tried to fix that
problem by myself.
Thanks,
Fabio Varesano
On 02/01/2011 05:47 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
Hello Marco,
I like it but it has still some issues with wxWidgets on Mac with
version 2.9.2 from svn (rev 66766).
I put a screenshot on my server over here:
http://kicad.xor-gate.org/screenshots/new-plot-screen-issues.png
The issues are the format frame, and the gerber options entries labels
31 matches
Mail list logo
