Re: [kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk, upcoming qt-4.4.1, etc.

2008-06-19 Thread David Johnson
On Thursday 19 June 2008 03:51:13 am Max Brazhnikov wrote: > 6) separate Uitools from qdesigner? This will affect on 4-5 ports in > freebsd portstree and free them from qdesigner. There are other Designer related libraries besides QtUiTools. There are also QtDesigner and QtDesignerComponents. Th

Re: [kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk, upcoming qt-4.4.1, etc.

2008-06-19 Thread David Johnson
On Thursday 19 June 2008 03:51:13 am Max Brazhnikov wrote: > Before I go futher with kde4 ports and freebsd ports, I want to know your > opinion: > > 1) Is anybody has other solution or satisfied with current situation? > > 2) does it make sense to introduce QT_COMPONENTS_BUILD_and_RUN? (I'm 50/50)

[kde-freebsd] bsd.qt.mk, upcoming qt-4.4.1, etc.

2008-06-19 Thread Max Brazhnikov
Dear qt4 ports hackers/maintainers, Current implementation bsd.qt.mk allows to use _build and _run suffixes for items in QT_COMPONENTS, nonsuffixed items are treated as build and run dependencies. Half of qt4 dependent ports (the total number of qt4 ports is about one hundred) doesn't respect