On Thursday 19 June 2008 03:51:13 am Max Brazhnikov wrote: > Before I go futher with kde4 ports and freebsd ports, I want to know your > opinion: > > 1) Is anybody has other solution or satisfied with current situation? > > 2) does it make sense to introduce QT_COMPONENTS_BUILD_and_RUN? (I'm 50/50) > > 3) rename QT_COMPONENTS_RUN to QT_RUN, etc.? ( it's shorter, I like it)
Another solution is to fix the documentation on how to use QT_COMPONENTS. If ports properly use the _build suffixes, then there is not a problem. (I've fixed a few instances of this in my own workspace, but not all). An example of usage in the Porter's Handbook would be good. I would like to see comments in bsd.qt.mk too. > There are several other questions not directly related to this work, but > I'd like to hear answers from you: > > 4) why not to add qt4-sql-plugins to QT_COMPONENTS for the sake of > consistency? This also brings up an issue I found last night. Assistant depends on qt4-sqlite-plugin. It builds and runs without it, but you get runtime warnings and no documentation. Instead of making it a component however, it should be a separate dependency. I'm not sure about adding plugins to the component list. I think they should be options for the qt4-sql port, with sqlite on by default. > 6) separate Uitools from qdesigner? This will affect on 4-5 ports in > freebsd portstree and free them from qdesigner. Yes it should be separate, as it's a runtime library. Isn't it already in area51 though? > 7) not of great importance -- switch qt4 to USE_BZIP2? (now qt4 zipped > sources is more than 100Mb) Sounds fine by me. > I'd like to finish with this before qt4-4.4.1 release to not multiply > essences. News from this morning: 4.4.1 has been delayed two weeks. Should be released in the middle of July. -- David Johnson _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
