Danny Pansters schrieb:
>> Right now, I don't even know if KDE4,
>> whatever the final shape of the ports, will be able to coexist with KDE3.
>>
>
> It should and can be I think.
>
It certainly can be done depending on how much we are able to accomodate
KDE and violate POLA to get there. I
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 03:01:58 Danny Pansters wrote:
> On Monday 05 November 2007 17:15:32 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > Parts of it compile, parts of it run.
>
> A me-too of sorts: a month or so ago I tried building it from homegrown
> ports, that is kdesupport, kdelibs, kdebase, kdepimlibs,
On Monday 05 November 2007 17:15:32 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> David Naylor schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering what condition KDE4 is in regards to FreeBSD. Does it
> > compile and run
>
> Parts of it compile, parts of it run.
A me-too of sorts: a month or so ago I tried building it from h
David Naylor schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what condition KDE4 is in regards to FreeBSD. Does it
> compile and run
Parts of it compile, parts of it run.
> , also have some ports been written for some of the
> KDE4 packages.
No.
> I have noticed a trend to break up these big
> monolithic pac
On Thursday 01 November 2007 21:38:52 David Naylor wrote:
> I was wondering what condition KDE4 is in regards to FreeBSD. Does it
The last time I built it - early last week, I think, on 6-STABLE on i386 with
XOrg 7.2 - it comes up and then KNotify does an endless crash loop, leaving
ctrl-alt-ba
Hi,
I was wondering what condition KDE4 is in regards to FreeBSD. Does it
compile and run, also have some ports been written for some of the
KDE4 packages. I have noticed a trend to break up these big
monolithic packages into smaller units (openSuse in particular have
done this for KDE4 and we h
