On Friday 06 Jul 2007, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 14:18:03 Alex Merry wrote:
> > On Friday 06 Jul 2007, you wrote:
> > > actually is due a cmake test that it is no founding the
> > > setproctitle funtion on FreeBSD and then not creating the
> > > corresponding prepocessor HAVE
On Friday 06 Jul 2007, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007 14:18:03 Alex Merry wrote:
> > On Friday 06 Jul 2007, you wrote:
> > > actually is due a cmake test that it is no founding the
> > > setproctitle funtion on FreeBSD and then not creating the
> > > corresponding prepocessor HAVE
On Friday 06 July 2007 14:18:03 Alex Merry wrote:
> On Friday 06 Jul 2007, you wrote:
> > actually is due a cmake test that it is no founding the setproctitle
> > funtion on FreeBSD and then not creating the corresponding
> > prepocessor HAVE_SETPROCTITLE directive.
> >
> > so until someone figure
On Friday 06 Jul 2007, you wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> after 7 weeks of pain, i finally found why kio-slaves from trunk was
> failling on FreeBSD.
> actually is due a cmake test that it is no founding the setproctitle
> funtion on FreeBSD and then not creating the corresponding
> prepocessor HAVE_SETPROCT
Hi Guys
after 7 weeks of pain, i finally found why kio-slaves from trunk was failling
on FreeBSD.
actually is due a cmake test that it is no founding the setproctitle funtion
on FreeBSD and then not creating the corresponding prepocessor
HAVE_SETPROCTITLE directive.
so until someone figure o
