On Friday 06 Jul 2007, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007 14:18:03 Alex Merry wrote: > > On Friday 06 Jul 2007, you wrote: > > > actually is due a cmake test that it is no founding the > > > setproctitle funtion on FreeBSD and then not creating the > > > corresponding prepocessor HAVE_SETPROCTITLE directive. > > > > > > so until someone figure out how to fix this cmake issue i make > > > this awful hack in kdelibs/kinit/proctitle.cpp that fix the > > > problem ( only for freebsd users ;) ) > > > > Can I suggest you just put > > #ifdef __FreeBSD__ > > #define HAVE_SETPROCTITLE 1 > > #endif > > > > near the top of the file? > > You may mean Q_OS_FREEBSD instead of __FreeBSD__ (I think that > catches DragonFly as well). Remind me later this afternoon (I'm in > the foyer in front of the hack lab near the tea) and I'll fix up the > cmake test.
We'd need to include some Qt stuff for that. The cmake test is currently CHECK_FUNCTION_EXISTS(setproctitle, HAVE_SETPROCTITLE) which I'd have thought would work. However, there's definitely something up - cmake doesn't find the __progname variable on my linux box, but it should exist in glibc. Alex -- KDE: http://www.kde.org Ubuntu/Kubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.org http://www.kubuntu.org Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
