Join Future Movement Official discussion forum
http://www.futuremovement.org/forum
In The Future Movement Forum you can find:
Political section: where you can discuss the latest developments and express
your opinion and thoughts within the political debates and discussions.
Recent news sec
On Thursday 23 August 2007 17:43:40 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> this and programs using STL or Boost turn gcc into an even bigger hog.
KDE4's use of the STL and Boost is quite a lot more extensive than KDE3. Heck,
even I'm writing multiple partial template specializations to handle pid_t
being a
Mikhail Teterin schrieb:
> четвер 23 серпень 2007 11:19 до, Michael Nottebrock Ви написали:
>
>> I really really really do not think that this should be the default.
>> Consider that users of SMP machines, especially those running KDE, might
>> appreciate having one cpu/core available for their
четвер 23 серпень 2007 11:19 до, Michael Nottebrock Ви написали:
> I really really really do not think that this should be the default.
> Consider that users of SMP machines, especially those running KDE, might
> appreciate having one cpu/core available for their desktop work while a
> portupgrade
Mikhail Teterin schrieb:
> четвер 23 серпень 2007 10:09 до, Michael Nottebrock Ви написали:
>
>> Please back this out or at least hide it behind an option. Anyone who
>> wants to parallelize make and is willing to deal with the possible
>> fallout can easily do so already, this is no safe defaul
четвер 23 серпень 2007 10:09 до, Michael Nottebrock Ви написали:
> Please back this out or at least hide it behind an option. Anyone who
> wants to parallelize make and is willing to deal with the possible
> fallout can easily do so already, this is no safe default for everybody.
Michael, with all
The following reply was made to PR ports/115624; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports/115624: x11/kdelibs3 - kmail crash and hang
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:30:34
David Southwell schrieb:
> Current report found at: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149003
> Previous report found at: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147358
>
> As you will see from the dialogue there seem to be some resistance amongst
> kde
> developer team to take this bug seriously
Mikhail T. schrieb:
> Hello!
>
> The mini-patch below scales the build of the Qt port to the number of
> available processes. I think, it should be put in while the portmgr is
> debating/devising a more general solution -- something may be needed
> to accomodate machines, where multiple such ports
