Mikhail Teterin schrieb: > четвер 23 серпень 2007 10:09 до, Michael Nottebrock Ви написали: > >> Please back this out or at least hide it behind an option. Anyone who >> wants to parallelize make and is willing to deal with the possible >> fallout can easily do so already, this is no safe default for everybody. >> > > Michael, with all due respect to your wishes, I'd like to receive a single > failure report first... I've used this myself for a while on both single- and > multi-CPU machines and had no issues. Without "releasing into wild", we'll > never move on. So, unless there is a release pending soon, I'd like to keep > the change. > I really really really do not think that this should be the default. Consider that users of SMP machines, especially those running KDE, might appreciate having one cpu/core available for their desktop work while a portupgrade is in progress in the background. Jacking up the load to the possible maximum does not make for a smooth desktop experience. >> I am certainly not going to do anything similar in the KDE or QT4 ports. >> > > That's surely up to you, the maintainers. > To clarify: What I am not going to do is to make something like this the default, unconditionally, for everybody. A switch for people interested in this is always possible. If you have patches for bsd.kde.mk / bsd.qt.mk which implement this and work for you, feel free to submit them.
Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
